Space and Orientation

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gonzo4life44
    FFR Player
    • May 2004
    • 626

    #16
    RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Space and Orientation

    have your ever herd the paradox about the magnetic poles canceling out each other? basically i kinda forgot how it went but it said something due to gravity the magnetic poles cancel out each other, which make movement impossibe cuz earth it self is cancelled out due to this effect.

    sence there is no gravity in space, we can move around cuz in order for that thery to be true, you need gravity. sence theres no gravity in space, we can move around, but other objects such as planets, they cant.


    Comment

    • psychic25
      FFR Player
      • Oct 2003
      • 367

      #17
      RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Space and Orientation

      Originally posted by gonzo4life44
      sence there is no gravity in space, we can move around cuz in order for that thery to be true, you need gravity. sence theres no gravity in space, we can move around, but other objects such as planets, they cant.
      What are you talking about?

      Ever hear about PLANETARY ORBITS? Like how the Earth travels around the Sun? What keeps it in orbit? ELECTROMAGNETISM? I think not.

      And ever hear about gravity wells? (That's only a decent model. There are better ones, but I don't want to take the time to look for them.)

      Everything exerts gravity on everything else, no matter how far apart they are. If the space between them is empty, it DOESN'T MATTER.

      Oh, and I'd really like to see that paradox about the magnetic poles. I had always thought that gravity and electromagnetism had nothing to do with each other. (And if you find it, please post a link and don't paraphrase).

      EDIT: Oh, and I think that the topic of no-gravity came up because we assumed, in the original question, that we were talking about a region of space that is far, far away from any other objects. When close to a celestial body, gravity takes effect. duh

      Comment

      • senate7377
        FFR Player
        • Jun 2005
        • 137

        #18
        RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Space and Orientation

        hey I jsut made and explanation based ont he criteria of the question. Rather than assume someone meant this or that, I went along with the hypothetical...not the real (manily cause the hypothetical, while very unrealistic, was easier to answer). Im not a quantum physicist - if I was Id probably still be single...

        Comment

        • psychic25
          FFR Player
          • Oct 2003
          • 367

          #19
          RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Space and Orientation

          Senate, what you said makes sense, but Gonzo, I think you're taking things to an extreme and assuming that the facts of the hypothetical situation hold true everywhere in the real universe.

          Comment

          • Snapps
            NO DOUBT GET LOUD
            FFR Simfile Author
            • Sep 2003
            • 5650

            #20
            RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Space and Orientation

            You know what psychic25, I wish we could have these conversations =/.

            Comment

            • gonzo4life44
              FFR Player
              • May 2004
              • 626

              #21
              RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Space and Orientation

              yea i guess i am thinking out side he box cuz they way i see it going back to that paradox, gravity and magnetic pole are compleaty 2 different things. there is gravity in space, i just didnt say the question right.


              Comment

              Working...