Saw it Friday night, but I haven't been on a computer since.
I thought it was great, a lot more like Pulp Fiction and Reservoir Dogs than vol. 1. More story, more dialogue, more Tarantino-esque. It was the perfect second half to the movie.
That said, I prefered volume 1. It seemed a bit more original, enjoyable, to quote a newspaper critic, "crazy cool". The great thing about the movie is that if you consider both parts together you have the best of both worlds. You have the complete homage of the first part that ties in with the direct Kung Fu movie copy of the Pai Mai training, and you have the beautiful characters and dialoge a la Pulp Fiction.
So, anyone else see it?
I thought it was great, a lot more like Pulp Fiction and Reservoir Dogs than vol. 1. More story, more dialogue, more Tarantino-esque. It was the perfect second half to the movie.
That said, I prefered volume 1. It seemed a bit more original, enjoyable, to quote a newspaper critic, "crazy cool". The great thing about the movie is that if you consider both parts together you have the best of both worlds. You have the complete homage of the first part that ties in with the direct Kung Fu movie copy of the Pai Mai training, and you have the beautiful characters and dialoge a la Pulp Fiction.
So, anyone else see it?
). I don't know. Maybe that's just me.
it doesn't have a regular plot laid out in a regular fashion, but it sure does have a plot. Realize that the plot is all the events reagarding the briefcase (the briefcase contains Wallace's soul... a lot of people never pick up on that.)
Comment