ugh... bumps

[rushyrulz]

I'm gettin kinda sick of people calling 1st pagers bumps if you reply to them. If a 1st pager is considered a bump, then the section is dying and it needs all the posts it can get.

Just blowin off steam here. Does anyone agree with me or has everyone turned into arrogant assholes?

[gnr61]

Re: ugh... bumps

remind me to bump this in a few weeks.

[rushyrulz]

Re: ugh... bumps

gnr is stalking me! Help! I need a restraining order!

[gabgabo]

Re: ugh... bumps

Seriously, you're right. Whatever is the longest of these, for me, isn't considered a bump.

- 1st Page
- 1 week after last reply

[GuidoHunter]

Re: ugh... bumps

"Bumping" a thread effectively includes necroposting in its definition. It may technically be one and not the other, but either way it's going to be called a bump.

Live with it.

P.S. Yes, some forums are slow, but that doesn't mean that people will want to talk about the two-month-old thread on the front page.

--Guido

http://andy.mikee385.com