Aids Needle

[Tokzic]

Re: Aids Needle

yeah because your word sure does count for something

give us a link or you fail

[redraver]

Re: Aids Needle

yeah and so do random websites?
they have about as much credibility as I do

do you know what credibility means?

[KA0Z R4VR]

Re: Aids Needle

I don't understand that if you are so skeptic to talk about 'circulating emails' that prove no validity along with other websites on this trust worthy internet, you should not try and use a website to prove against internet credibility. Logical thinking; it takes 5 seconds.

[Tokzic]

Re: Aids Needle

lmfao

Hey idiots. Think it's a coincidence that every single website that has anything to say about it says it's a hoax, while there is not a single thing on the Internet supports your claim? (besides forwarded e-mails, which are almost always hoaxes)

You guys sure are good at making points.

[redraver]

Re: Aids Needle

actually
we are
because the only proof we had was aired on TV days ago
you dont live in vegas
niether do you go online to watch the news casts from vegas
so you cannot disprove what we are saying
you are going nowhere

[KA0Z R4VR]

Re: Aids Needle

Hey, live in vegas. Watch the news. Don't use the internet to prove your clamis, because unlike you, I did not find this on the internet; it just so happened that I used AIM to tell someone else about it. Logical thinking-5 seconds-really.





EDIT:
redboriqua702 (3:30:44 PM): shashakiro is going to ban us for hacking knowledge
Hello R4VR (4:30:55 PM): lmfao!
redboriqua702 (3:31:00 PM): ^_^

[Tokzic]

Re: Aids Needle

actually
we are
because the only proof we had was aired on TV days ago
you dont live in vegas
niether do you go online to watch the news casts from vegas
so you cannot disprove what we are saying
you are going nowhere

"I can't disprove what you're saying"? There's no evidence whatsoever to what you're saying. There's nothing to disprove.

"Logical thinking"? You're the one whose argument consists of one single fallacy. Maybe you're the one who should learn how to logically think.

[KA0Z R4VR]

Re: Aids Needle

Uhm, the context in which we are talking about [the AIDS needles] is what you are trying to disprove - PWNT #1

And, logical thinking that you SHOULD NOT use the internet to disprove what you think is an internet claim.

Do you NOT have 5 seconds to think deeply for once?

LMFAO "To logically think..." = split infinitive = lesser logic = PWNT #2

[redraver]

Re: Aids Needle

and the evidence to what we are saying was aired on TV
which is a much more reliable source then that of the internet

a newscast would not be made for an urban myth with no evidence
it DID happen
so they DID a newscast

[KA0Z R4VR]

Re: Aids Needle

and the evidence to what we are saying was aired on TV
which is a much more reliable source then that of the internet

a newscast would not be made for an urban myth with no evidence
it DID happen
so they DID a newscast

PWNT #3

[Tokzic]

Re: Aids Needle

lmfao

I'm sure saying "PWNT" makes you feel victorious and special, but you're getting nowhere.

Want to see "PWNT #1" and "PWNT #2"?

One - your logic means your entire argument is invalid.

Two - here's the precise equivalent of your stance in this thread. "THERE'S NO PROOF DRAGONS DON'T EXIST, SO THEREFORE THEY EXIST".

[KA0Z R4VR]

Re: Aids Needle

Want another 'PWNT'? You are STILL using internet sources as your back-up. I like the dragon thread - great deus ex machina - but it doesn't cut it.

PLUS wiki is the worst EVER internet source you could use; for instance [since you like them so much] I can re-write any entry on there. ANYONE CAN! You thought a bit more deeply, but still not logically.

[redraver]

Re: Aids Needle

Two - here's the precise equivalent of your stance in this thread. "THERE'S NO PROOF DRAGONS DON'T EXIST, SO THEREFORE THEY EXIST".

no
what we are trying to prove is that just because
You didnt see the evidence
doesnt make it a False or invalid claim

"YOU'RE NOT GOD"
your not the judge of what is true or not



PS. you fail

[KA0Z R4VR]

Re: Aids Needle

Yeah, we are not trying to proove something that doesn't exists. That is illogical [if you ever learned proofs in math], we are doing the opposite. Your logic is not consistant

First - You accuse the internet of incredibility

Second - You use the internet to attempt to disprove our facts

Third - You should know better than to use dragons against ANY topic if you are trying to make a point. They don't exist! Don't use something that don't even exists!!!!! Especially if you challenge logicla thinking.

[Tokzic]

Re: Aids Needle

But that's what you're doing. There is nothing to indicate that there are actually HIV-infected needles anywhere but your word that there was a news article on it, which is worth as much as the dragontologist's word that dragons exist. Both you and the dragontologist say "THERE'S NOTHING TO DISPROVE WHAT I SAY IS TRUE," which is logical fallacy, which is hilarious because you love spewing crap about logical thinking constantly when you can't even do it yourself.

So basically you're wrong and unless you have proof you can't convince anyone of it. Bye.