i would also like to take this opportunity to shout out deadlyx39
on the one hand i feel as though your absence from these forums is a shelled victory for all ffr forumites however after careful examination of my internal feeling apparatus i have come to the conclusion that i do in fact miss your posts
Your threads don't have potential for discussion though...
this is said a lot but no one ever qualifies it
here, let me do it:
any thread with a declarative sentence in the body text has potential for discussion because this is asserting something that can be evaluated as true/false
thread with potential for discussion: "_________ [is/are] _______."
or anything along these lines, including implied "is" statements like "I feel that...", and "is" statements implied by questions
no potential for discussion:
"ouch!"
"zounds!"
"peter piper picked a pack of pickled peppers"
"aeoiu aeoiu aeoiu aeoiu"
"john madden john madden john madden john madden"
"drop it drop it low girl drop it drop it low girl"
"ayyyyyyyyy macarena"
"ouch!"
"zounds!"
"peter piper picked a pack of pickled peppers"
"aeoiu aeoiu aeoiu aeoiu"
"john madden john madden john madden john madden"
"drop it drop it low girl drop it drop it low girl"
"ayyyyyyyyy macarena"
Huh
Originally posted by top
Inb4 lock
Originally posted by top
Inb4 lock
Originally posted by Arch0wl
I might see staff forum
dis vato gonna snoop on you putas and snipe your chisme, gettin super hot succcc of dikkk jaja
no fam, pls
I don't care
you may forget about Dre
you just have rules that were written with the balance and scale of Monopoly, yes as in the board game
shit's broken dog
park place? what the fuck?
Just trying to figure out what huge discussions are coming out of this rather than 'inb4 lock' and 'mods suk, they gotta be straightened out' posts
Just trying to figure out what huge discussions are coming out of this
well, first, they aren't "huge". you said "discussions." if the requirement is huge discussions then very few topics, if any, on any forum fit.
but anyway, forums are an open discussion environment
so are parties; you can walk up to groups and be like "bblaaaahakhklggg" and power through their immediate disdain until you're funny enough to redeem yourself (and by "you can" I mean I do this kind of shit)
like parties, there are multiple conversations going on at any given time
this isn't a bad thing. it may be a bit disorganized but it works and people can follow at their leisure.
this thread is clearly a critique of modding rules and maybe practices. that much is obvious, and that's a legit thing to discuss. other than that, I don't know, but you seem to be expecting a lot. "discussion" is a low bar for entry, man.
this thread is clearly a critique of modding rules and maybe practices. that much is obvious, and that's a legit thing to discuss. other than that, I don't know, but you seem to be expecting a lot. "discussion" is a low bar for entry, man.
If you have ideas, you can write them and express them here.
you don't need a master's in mathematics or philosophy to write professional papers in mathematics or philosophy
nonetheless, good luck otherwise.
if I suggest rules, here is what will happen:
1. admins look at list
2. admins discuss list
3. admins adopt like 5-10% of things
4. admins go back to business as usual
being an admin for a day makes the whole package need to be accepted at once
while they could certainly reverse the rule changes I made as admin too, this:
1. makes them change something actively instead of rejecting something passively
2. behavioral econ / social psych shows they are less likely to do this unless the rule is just obviously bad, so the only changes they do make will be the substantial ones
Comment