I often post research reviews involving scientific studies of hormone interactions on a steroid board. These would be beneficial to link in the fitness forum, since these hormones exist in everyone and knowledge of how they work is useful to drug-free weightlifters as well.
Example: one post I made was about the hormone interactions in women when they take birth control and how this suppresses testosterone.
Now I could just copy/paste the body of these posts to FFR, but FFR uses a very different hyperlink system, and sometimes I'll have 10 or 20 links in a single post.
So the easy solution is just to link my post. However...
I'm not sure if this violates any rules. I looked at the rules and the only rule I could see that it *might* violate is this one:
This message board does not provide means of getting illegal anything, it just discusses how the compounds work. No one could get any illegal content solely from viewing the board.
But in the past, FFR mods have taken liberties with these rules and read them quite broadly, so I'd like some clarification here.
(If an FFR mod wants an example of these posts, google "Birth control's role in widespread androgen deficiency in women and its implications for the field of psychology" and the first result should be mine. I don't think referencing google keywords here is against the rules.)
Anyway, I hope these aren't against the rules and don't think they would be, but I've been surprised before, so I'm asking for clarification.
Example: one post I made was about the hormone interactions in women when they take birth control and how this suppresses testosterone.
Now I could just copy/paste the body of these posts to FFR, but FFR uses a very different hyperlink system, and sometimes I'll have 10 or 20 links in a single post.
So the easy solution is just to link my post. However...
I'm not sure if this violates any rules. I looked at the rules and the only rule I could see that it *might* violate is this one:
- Request or provide links to illegal content, i.e. music, warez, etc....
But in the past, FFR mods have taken liberties with these rules and read them quite broadly, so I'd like some clarification here.
(If an FFR mod wants an example of these posts, google "Birth control's role in widespread androgen deficiency in women and its implications for the field of psychology" and the first result should be mine. I don't think referencing google keywords here is against the rules.)
Anyway, I hope these aren't against the rules and don't think they would be, but I've been surprised before, so I'm asking for clarification.