Because when the site was at its absolute peak of popularity and activity, it was nuked by Wiki staff for non-notability, questions as to whether it was being created by people with a vested interest in and connection to the site, and the utter lack of actual citations from non-first-party sources.
Everything about the site and company now is even less notable and even less cited than it was then. There is no way they will let it stay up, so I wouldn't waste my time on it.
I feel as though there are far less notable things that have managed to stay listed on Wikipedia. Also the idea that the largest online encyclopedia would reject anything with valid information on something seems a little ass-backwards.
Thanks! This actually happened rather recently. If my article is viewed as a legitimate reference by wikipedia, then by all means include it! Also a quick google search net myself quite a few more reviews and articles about FFR by many other news/gaming websites which could be included as references.
DotKritic.. honestly I really expected a considerable amount more effort to go into this article .. especially coming from you. If the wikipedia article is still up by the time I get back to my dorm tonight (unlikely), I will try to contribute. edit: to be fair, credit is due where credit is due. thanks justin for editting one word, lol. add me on skype if you'd like to expand the article further, as it takes quite some time for the article moderators to confirm changes ^^
Comment