sorry but wait is the point of this to break down or uphold the doctrine of the women(s/'s?z/z/z) standpoint so to speak and its proposed dominance in feminist dialogues
your responses to devonin make me think it's the latter but if so why solicit submissions from not-women
sorry but wait is the point of this to break down or uphold the doctrine of the women(s/'s?z/z/z) standpoint so to speak and its proposed dominance in feminist dialogues
your responses to devonin make me think it's the latter but if so why solicit submissions from not-women
i guess that's a false dichotomy but
not about just women, the class deals strictly with feminism, but the project is sort of an all-encompassing forum for inequalities of difference and how they have affected everyone in social spheres (examples can be seen on the website)
my response to devonin was saying that women's standpoint allows for a myriad view that the dominant social class would otherwise not fully understand and thus allows us to expose various forms of oppression and social injustice (or leads to refreshing perspectives in science or other things) -- not exactly relevant to the project, that's why i asked devonin to take his argument to PMs
If you think that getting anonymous submissions from women to provide the bulk of a project that you are getting credit for isn't an ironic demonstration of the glass ceiling in action, I'm not sure what to tell you.
I'm pretty sure I get it, but if the people in power don't take a stance for those who aren't (in this case women), then the people who aren't in power will make absolutely no advancement short of forcefully taking the power to themselves.
Comment