since when does one ban evasion result in IP bans when the initial ban was for not agreeing with staff and talking about it in a calm and proper manner in the first place?
quick question
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Comment
-
Re: quick question
What happened?1st in Kommisar's 2009 SM Tournament
1st in I Love You`s 2009 New Year`s Tournament
3rd in EnR's Mashfest '08 tournament
5th in Phynx's Unofficial FFR Tournament
9th in D3 of the 2008-2009 4th Official FFR Tournament
10th in D5 of the 2010 5th Official FFR Tournament
10th in D6 of the 2011-2012 6th Official FFR Tournament
FMO AAA Count: 71
FGO AAA Count: 10
Bluearrowll = The Canadian player who can not detect awkward patterns. If it's awkward for most people, it's normal for Terry. If the file is difficult but super straight forward, he has issues. If he's AAAing a FGO but then heard that his favorite Hockey team was losing by a point, Hockey > FFR
PS: Cool AAA's Terry - I Love You
An Alarm Clock's Haiku
beep beep beep beep beep
beep beep beep beep beep beep beep
beep beep beep beep beep - ieatyourlvllolComment
-
Re: quick question
I was gonna ask the same question until he ban evaded and I was all like ://///
pretty sure ban evasion means game over, period. that's how most websites handle their biz.Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Re: quick question
"In closing, **** you AP, you're a clueless retard."
I thought this is what he got originally banned for, and if it is I don't think it's talking in a calm and proper manner (probably taken out of context though as I don't have the original post)RIP Steve Van Ness <3Comment
-
Re: quick question
Yes, that is most likely the reason why. I'd like to add, however, that the nature of the response is just as critical to justifying a ban. For instance, I can certainly see in this example how others might view this as an abuse of power - i.e. "if you insult me you're banned". Looking at his previous posts, it appears that his point wasn't well-acknowledged or well-received, that people just "didn't get it". Ultimately, foilman made his point in frustration one last time but clearly ap had the last say. What I don't understand is this:
02:42:06pm 03/24/12 - aperson blacklisted foilman8806. All scores have been deleted.
This should only apply if foilman cheated with scores in the FFR game, but I don't recall foilman ever doing this. If his scores were wiped due to a disagreement in a completely different topic of conversation (i.e. irrelevant), then that's wrong. If he evaded by posting in a different account, the consequences shouldn't extend to gameplay itself.Comment
-
Re: quick question
I assume the nature of ap's actions are a result from this: http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/...54&postcount=1
however, foilman isn't even on the list but was still given full punishment which is by all means debatable.Comment
-




Comment