?!?!?! WOA! FFR for CSS?

[Freak83]

RE: Re: RE: ?!?!?! WOA! FFR for CSS?

Ok, the flashbangs are cooler now. I'll add that in, do they have new guns? I wouldn't know. I notice you can't bunnyhop though.

[QreepyBORIS]

RE: Re: RE: ?!?!?! WOA! FFR for CSS?

It is now the polar opposite of UT.

Even more so.



Oh, and I saw Synth in there.

[insomniakxz]

Re: RE: ?!?!?! WOA! FFR for CSS?

Sad day for FFR.

Sad day for the English language.

No new guns. They took away shield.

[Freak83]

Re: RE: Re: RE: ?!?!?! WOA! FFR for CSS?

It is now the polar opposite of UT.

Even more so.



Oh, and I saw Synth in there.

I knifed Synth in there.

[Squeek]

Re: RE: ?!?!?! WOA! FFR for CSS?

Sad day for FFR.

Sad day for the English language.

No new guns. They took away shield.

There's nothing wrong with his statement. Did you quote the wrong thing, possibly?

There is, however, something wrong with YOUR post. You left out a "the" before "shield". This word is necessary.

~Squeek (I'm not being a grammar nazi, so shut up. I have my reasons.)

[QreepyBORIS]

RE: Re: RE: ?!?!?! WOA! FFR for CSS?

He was implying that al CSers speak poor English.

[fusi0n]

RE: Re: RE: ?!?!?! WOA! FFR for CSS?

ya i no y do we need 2 lern english we're not even in england lol!

[Omeganitros]

Re: RE: Re: RE: ?!?!?! WOA! FFR for CSS?

I knifed Synth in there.

Haha, me too. I don't think he knew the usefulness of the knife's secondary attack.

Synth is actully pretty good. A bit better than me, anyways.

[QreepyBORIS]

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: ?!?!?! WOA! FFR for CSS?

Server's been down for like 24 hours.

Or he managed to ban me from it, hah.

[buttonkiller]

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: ?!?!?! WOA! FFR for CSS?

what is css?

[fusi0n]

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: ?!?!?! WOA! FFR for CSS?

coon syrup syndrome o sumpin