Is this AAAable?

[Goldenwind]

189.51BPM

I know 4ths and 8ths will be fine...
I know that 16ths aren't.

However, what if I had Down/Right/Down, all in 16ths? Would the two Downs be too close?
What if I did the same pattern in 32nds?

And just so I don't need to bug people again, can someone also teach me how to do the math on my own?

Thanks.

[SoulSk8er69]

Re: Is this AAAable?

2626 32nd trills at almost 190 BPM?

ouch?

[bluguerrilla]

Re: Is this AAAable?

2626 32nd trills at almost 190 BPM?

ouch?

Yeah ouch and yes, that sounds un AAA'ble if it's 2626 in 32nd's (but not so for the 16th's), going by what Tass said about jacks being to close but I don't know the specifics of what's going wrong with ffr at that point, either way it's gonna hurt ... I know it probably doesn't go with the music as well but maybe 6842 would be a better choice for the 32nds but still, that's really fast but has been done (lawn wake)...

[smartdude1212]

Re: Is this AAAable?

Lawn Wake 32nds are... as far apart as possible.
As in, 68246824. Not something like 6824286.

[bluguerrilla]

Re: Is this AAAable?

right, meant 6824 not 6842 in reference to lawn wake but if you repeat either of those (without reversing them), the notes are as far away from eachother as possible. Even though 6842 is harder to read when it's repeated the motion seems more natural to me than 6824... but that's just me.

[Yesssss]

Re: Is this AAAable?

189 bpm 16ths are easily AAA'ble in any pattern.

189 bpm 32nd trills are AAA'ble if they're short. Best to use rolls anyway as they are much easier to do.

Unless we're talking about FFR then I have no idea.