Moderation?

[itmorr]

We've noticed various hatred on the site recently. All moderation woes are personal vendettas based on differences of opinion. If we get rid of moderation on the site, all hatred will cease.

Although I'm posting this, it's not my own opinion, but I feel like it should at least be considered.

[Sir_Thomas]

Re: Moderation?

Too little words, such little time.
A lot of the moderating staff seems to be biased.

[Izzy]

Re: Moderation?

Um. I dont think this would solve anything. It is still the internet.

[foilman8805]

Re: Moderation?

People are just naturally going to disagree on things, and some carry a grudge more discreetly than others.

Are you calling for a complete moderation overhaul? Like new mods, or none at all?

[Calcium Deposit]

Re: Moderation?

No mods

[itmorr]

Re: Moderation?

No mods

No mods

[foilman8805]

Re: Moderation?

Even within anarchy there are leaders.

P.S. Who is 'we'?

[Commandersa1]

Re: Moderation?

No mods

Are you serious? How would that help anything? More spamming/flaming/trolling/etc... would happen because no one would enforce it. What moderator would agree to this? They would lose their fancy colored name that everyone adores.

[Tasselfoot]

Re: Moderation?

yes... who is "we". and, this is an awful suggestion. not to mention, your statements are completely baseless and without any kind of situational examples to back them up.

in other words, this is complete trolling.

[llama499]

Re: Moderation?

actually allmost all the mods are good at their jobs, like right now someone stole all 130,000 of my credits so i PM sprite and he fixed it within 3 min.

[devonin]

Re: Moderation?

All moderation woes are personal vendettas based on differences of opinion.

I do all kinds of moderating and have no vendettas with anybody, not even Vendetta.

I'm curious, how does removing the ability to get rid of trolling, flaming, racism, spam, and bot advertising seem like it would make things better?