Re: StepCon 2024
My thoughts on charts!!!
Things You Should Know About My Thoughts:
- Chart order shows my overall ranking for the group, ordered from most favourite to least favourite chart. Numbers in bold are ones that I voted for.
- "[...]" denotes my reviewed thoughts after a second playthrough of the chart.
- I also didn't give all charts a second playthrough, so it's extremely likely that my opinions could have differed greatly from my initial feedback for some charts.
- Don't take my "ratings" too seriously (the "x/10" stuff), they're just my way of having fun while summing up each chart.
- I don't know why, but I was surprisingly harsh in a lot of my reviews. Try not to take it to heart if I was harsh to you, I have quite a unique viewpoint after all.
- Above all else I prioritise how much fun I had while playing a chart, which inevitably means that charts on the easier side of things will be to my distaste.
Chart Order: 3, 4, 2, 1
Atohs 1:
Some parts of this chart feel truly immaculate, with incredibly satisfying layering, PR and difficulty balance.
Then other parts have 2 bjillion bpm chordjacks and minijacks that appear out of nowhere with little to no consistency.
Not quite sure what to make of that.
Yin & Yang/10
Atohs 2:
Starts off with some pretty normal patterns, good layering, good melody representation.
Then it goes into a section that closely follows the melody, basically ignoring percussion- which is then immediately followed by a section that closely follows the percussion, ignoring the melody (which was very strange because the focus of these two sections should have been swapped in my opinion, and on top of that they both could have easily incorporated both melody and percussion anyway).
After this point, the chart progressively gets harder and harder, making any difficulty the previous half of the chart posed completely irrelevant.
[f(difficulty) = 2t] / 10
Atohs 3:
Creative and tasteful usage of colour theory throughout the chart.
Overall I think this is a very good interpretation of a high level chart for this song, it's certainly not what I expected but I think it works surprisingly well.
The difficulty is balanced well, with a small difficulty spike near the end (and that ending trill being incredibly rude, but I can trill each side of it so I’ll let it slide).
There was one hard section where I really could not see what was being represented there (I think it was meant to be the strings, but I really didn’t understand it).
Other than that, everything was both creative and had good flow- on top of having very consistent usage of patterning/layering.
[2nd playthrough: I noticed that some of the melody seemed a bit lacking representation in one section, and I think that there could be some better layering choices in the intro- but it was still a very fun and creative chart. A little less polished than my first impression led me to believe but still good.]
D8 chart/10
Atohs 4:
Can’t fault much of the patterning here, everything makes sense, flows well, and is consistent throughout the chart- apart from difficulty.
This chart is very, very spiky. The vast majority of it is simple jumpstream, and then you get jumpscared by minijacks, crazy fast streams, and trills.
[On 2nd playthrough, I kinda disagree with what I said about it being very spiky. It’s true that the majority of the chart is simple jumpstream, but the hard minijacks, fast streams, and trills, are all interspersed throughout the chart commonly enough that they don't feel out of place. There is still a bit of a diffspike at the end though.
But genuinely no idea what I was on about with it being “very, very spiky”.]
Mohawk?/10
Chart Order: 1, 6, 5, 4, 3, 7, 2
Group Notes:
I am Going To Cry if I have to play another group with so many minimalist charts in a row, dear God help me.
Mantle In The Dark 1:
Very well balanced, simple but consistent and very effective layering scheme/pattern choice, overall just felt really good to play.
A chart that perfectly met all my expectations of the song. Great job.
It’s not a masterpiece, simply because it doesn’t exceed my expectations, but rather meets all of them and offers nothing more.
I feel that there's more one could do with the song, but I haven’t yet seen what those things could be.
10/11
Mantle In The Dark 2:
Not much to say about this, very similar to MITD 1 but with considerably worse and less consistent patterning/layering choices- with the added bonus of huge diffspikes in the end because of the jacks.
Literally jumpscared me/10
Mantle In The Dark 3:
Minimalist chart.
I don’t entirely agree with a lot of the patterning choices made here, and for such a minimalist chart some of the 24th streams are pretty nasty.
Minimalist/10
Mantle In The Dark 4:
Solid chart, overall great pattern choices, consistent layering, and good flow- even if a little boring in the first half.
Main issues are the two 32nd roll walls (because diffspike) and the 1(one) single instance of minijack in the chart (because minor diffspike and it feels out of place).
Minijack In The Dark/10
Mantle In The Dark 5:
Another solid chart. I felt that at points (particularly in the first half) the PR was very off (likely due to the abstractions of charting only singles when there was a lot more than one sound going on), but despite that the patterns flowed very well, and the layering consistency was great too.
Definitely another chart like MITD 4 where the second half was more fun than the first half, but unlike 4, this one doesn’t have strange diff spikes, and generally flows much nicer.
[Now that I’ved played it again, this chart is very strange. It really feels like a lot of the patterning is quite arbitrary, while for the most part the rhythms are quite well structured.
And I really do dislike the extreme minimalism here, feels like a bit of a waste, even if it was executed well(?)]
Nice Flow/10
Mantle In The Dark 6:
Not a fan of the triplejack 12ths, but definitely a huge fan of the 20th streams.
Overall very solid file again- much like MITD 5, but with a more conventional layering and PR approach.
[The triplejacks aren’t actually that bad.]
Nice Streams/10
Mantle In The Dark 7:
I am lost for words.
I genuinely do not understand almost anything that is going on here.
Maybe I should take a look at this another time when it's not so late.
I don’t think 1am is the best time to try understanding this one.
Unhealthy Obsession with 24th Streams/10
Chart Order: 2 & 4, 3, 1
Group Notes:
Why are there not one, but two whole ass ITG Stamina charts???
Second Strike 1:
Not actually too fond of unnecessary index streams in my FFR files.
ITG Stamina/10
Second Strike 2:
Why Is Your Audio So Quiet???
Anyway ignoring that, actually an incredibly solid chart, flows great, very sound layering choices form a coherent experience with a consistent difficulty. Really fun to play.
Interesting colour theory(?)
I am not big brain enough to understand it so you do you I guess.
A little bit of a rough cut to the audio at the end, but there's not much you could do with this type of song.
Far In The Blue Sky colour scheme/10
Second Strike 3:
Hello ITG Stamina 2.
I see you’ve brought with you a couple 24th streams, and even some 32nd bursts, how daring.
ITG Stamina v2/10
Second Strike 4:
Another very solid chart, much like SS 2, but a bit more conservative on the minijack usage- both are perfectly valid approaches in my opinion.
Basically exactly what I would expect from this song. Great job.
Oh My Goodness Gracious An Actually Normal Chart Holy Shit/10
Chart Order: 1, 2, 3
Group Notes:
What an absolute banger of a class my goodness.
Smallest class, but by far the best too.
Memories in the Blue 1:
THANK YOU GOD FINALLY.
Congratulations on being the first chart so far that I have actually thoroughly enjoyed the entire way through oh my goodness gracious.
Excellent layering and pattern choice, consistency is on point, difficulty is moderately high but focuses more on short bursts or approachable patterns- making the entire chart quite approachable.
But most importantly, it's fun! Really fun actually!
The charter masterfully incorporates the bounciness of the song into the chart itself, and easily had me swaying side to side along with the music while playing.
Incredible work.
[Honestly a masterpiece of a chart. Hands down the best work in the entire stepcon.]
So Fun!!!/10
Memories in the Blue 2:
Another absolutely incredible chart.
This one focuses more on slightly longer bursts and sustained streams, which is a valid approach, however I do find shorter bursts to be slightly better suited to the punchiness of this song.
That said, this chart absolutely would have won my pick in any of the previous classes.
Absolute banger here. Great job.
So Fun!!/10
Memories in the Blue 3:
My goodness, yet another absolutely incredible chart.
In the first about 1/3 of the chart, there does seem to be just a little bit missing, feels like the chart isn’t quite as punchy as it should be- but it turns into near perfection for the other 2/3 of the chart, just like 1 and 2.
Unfortunately because of that lacking in the first third, I will place it ever-so-slightly lower than the other two, but again, this would have certainly won my pick in any other class.
Another amazing job. Well done.
[I definitely think this is the weakest of the three, much more so than on my initial playthrough. Still pretty good though]
Fun/10
Chart Order: 1, 6, 5, 4, 2, 3
Group Notes:
Actually some really cool charts in this group, weird cuts though.
GET OVER IT ! 1:
Excellent usage of repeating patterns throughout the entire chart, as well as excellent layering choices, abstraction choices, and PR.
Very, very fun to play.
My only nitpick is that one of the repeating burst patterns was a tad too fast for my taste, considering that it was quite an uncomfortable pattern.
Other than that, this chart is very near perfection.
[This really is an extraordinary chart with how it so cleanly directs your focus to certain parts of the song.
The weak part of this chart is definitely the dump section, which was pretty unclear with some of the abstraction choices, and certainly too hard compared to the rest of the chart.
If the stepartists of this and 6 combined forces, they would surely produce a truly perfect chart.]
FUN !/10
GET OVER IT ! 2:
An excellently put together minimalist chart, unfortunately I’m not going to vote for it when there’s a non-minimalist chart of the same quality available.
Minimalist (but actually quite good)/10
GET OVER IT ! 3:
Great chart, very fun to play, it's just that… It has a peculiar obsession with minijacks.
Usage of repeating patterns is once again excellent, however some abstraction choices and patterning choices (particularly with the dubstep-y section) was slightly strange to me, and didn’t flow as well as it could have.
MWC Map/10
GET OVER IT ! 4:
Yet another great chart.
Only slightly on the easier side this time, with great layering and usage of repeating patterns- even a sprinkling of tasteful and natural colour theory.
Importantly though, it lacks the punchyness and bursty fun of 1.
9/10
GET OVER IT ! 5:
Interesting choice to cut it.
Overall this is definitely my second favourite chart so far, it’s incredibly well put together and has just a bit more punchyness than 4, which makes it a strong contender indeed.
I am actually slightly saddened by the cut, I would have liked to play the rest of the song too.
[The cut is certainly less rough than I remember. I think in general this chart tried to do a little too much at once, I think that a less wholesome and more focused layering scheme would have been a slightly better choice. That’s not to say that this wasn’t executed well at all- in fact I very likely would have made an extremely similar style of chart, had I got this as my song.]
Cut Ver
/10
GET OVER IT ! 6:
Interesting choice to do a fade-out. I think it works a little better than the previous cut at least.
Very strong chart overall, excellent use of repeating patterns, layering is sound, and it has the vitally important quality of punchyness.
My only issue is that a few (indeed, a very small amount) of the abstractions are somewhere between ‘slightly unclear’ and ‘unclear’.
Still, I think in general the abstract dump parts are ever-so-slightly cleaner than in GOI 1, which puts it on roughly the same level.
Very well done.
(Why did you have to fade it though I don’t get it).
[Rather than the abstractions being ‘unclear’, I think that there were actually a couple spots where there should have been some kind of dumpy thing. The parts that were dumped were exquisitely done, much better than GOI 1.
Other than those tiny parts, it's basically a flawless chart. My main issue is that it's cut! I want to play more of the chart why did you cut it!!!]
Alan Walker - Faded/10
My thoughts on charts!!!
Things You Should Know About My Thoughts:
- Chart order shows my overall ranking for the group, ordered from most favourite to least favourite chart. Numbers in bold are ones that I voted for.
- "[...]" denotes my reviewed thoughts after a second playthrough of the chart.
- I also didn't give all charts a second playthrough, so it's extremely likely that my opinions could have differed greatly from my initial feedback for some charts.
- Don't take my "ratings" too seriously (the "x/10" stuff), they're just my way of having fun while summing up each chart.
- I don't know why, but I was surprisingly harsh in a lot of my reviews. Try not to take it to heart if I was harsh to you, I have quite a unique viewpoint after all.
- Above all else I prioritise how much fun I had while playing a chart, which inevitably means that charts on the easier side of things will be to my distaste.
Chart Order: 3, 4, 2, 1
Atohs 1:
Some parts of this chart feel truly immaculate, with incredibly satisfying layering, PR and difficulty balance.
Then other parts have 2 bjillion bpm chordjacks and minijacks that appear out of nowhere with little to no consistency.
Not quite sure what to make of that.
Yin & Yang/10
Atohs 2:
Starts off with some pretty normal patterns, good layering, good melody representation.
Then it goes into a section that closely follows the melody, basically ignoring percussion- which is then immediately followed by a section that closely follows the percussion, ignoring the melody (which was very strange because the focus of these two sections should have been swapped in my opinion, and on top of that they both could have easily incorporated both melody and percussion anyway).
After this point, the chart progressively gets harder and harder, making any difficulty the previous half of the chart posed completely irrelevant.
[f(difficulty) = 2t] / 10
Atohs 3:
Creative and tasteful usage of colour theory throughout the chart.
Overall I think this is a very good interpretation of a high level chart for this song, it's certainly not what I expected but I think it works surprisingly well.
The difficulty is balanced well, with a small difficulty spike near the end (and that ending trill being incredibly rude, but I can trill each side of it so I’ll let it slide).
There was one hard section where I really could not see what was being represented there (I think it was meant to be the strings, but I really didn’t understand it).
Other than that, everything was both creative and had good flow- on top of having very consistent usage of patterning/layering.
[2nd playthrough: I noticed that some of the melody seemed a bit lacking representation in one section, and I think that there could be some better layering choices in the intro- but it was still a very fun and creative chart. A little less polished than my first impression led me to believe but still good.]
D8 chart/10
Atohs 4:
Can’t fault much of the patterning here, everything makes sense, flows well, and is consistent throughout the chart- apart from difficulty.
This chart is very, very spiky. The vast majority of it is simple jumpstream, and then you get jumpscared by minijacks, crazy fast streams, and trills.
[On 2nd playthrough, I kinda disagree with what I said about it being very spiky. It’s true that the majority of the chart is simple jumpstream, but the hard minijacks, fast streams, and trills, are all interspersed throughout the chart commonly enough that they don't feel out of place. There is still a bit of a diffspike at the end though.
But genuinely no idea what I was on about with it being “very, very spiky”.]
Mohawk?/10
Chart Order: 1, 6, 5, 4, 3, 7, 2
Group Notes:
I am Going To Cry if I have to play another group with so many minimalist charts in a row, dear God help me.
Mantle In The Dark 1:
Very well balanced, simple but consistent and very effective layering scheme/pattern choice, overall just felt really good to play.
A chart that perfectly met all my expectations of the song. Great job.
It’s not a masterpiece, simply because it doesn’t exceed my expectations, but rather meets all of them and offers nothing more.
I feel that there's more one could do with the song, but I haven’t yet seen what those things could be.
10/11
Mantle In The Dark 2:
Not much to say about this, very similar to MITD 1 but with considerably worse and less consistent patterning/layering choices- with the added bonus of huge diffspikes in the end because of the jacks.
Literally jumpscared me/10
Mantle In The Dark 3:
Minimalist chart.
I don’t entirely agree with a lot of the patterning choices made here, and for such a minimalist chart some of the 24th streams are pretty nasty.
Minimalist/10
Mantle In The Dark 4:
Solid chart, overall great pattern choices, consistent layering, and good flow- even if a little boring in the first half.
Main issues are the two 32nd roll walls (because diffspike) and the 1(one) single instance of minijack in the chart (because minor diffspike and it feels out of place).
Minijack In The Dark/10
Mantle In The Dark 5:
Another solid chart. I felt that at points (particularly in the first half) the PR was very off (likely due to the abstractions of charting only singles when there was a lot more than one sound going on), but despite that the patterns flowed very well, and the layering consistency was great too.
Definitely another chart like MITD 4 where the second half was more fun than the first half, but unlike 4, this one doesn’t have strange diff spikes, and generally flows much nicer.
[Now that I’ved played it again, this chart is very strange. It really feels like a lot of the patterning is quite arbitrary, while for the most part the rhythms are quite well structured.
And I really do dislike the extreme minimalism here, feels like a bit of a waste, even if it was executed well(?)]
Nice Flow/10
Mantle In The Dark 6:
Not a fan of the triplejack 12ths, but definitely a huge fan of the 20th streams.
Overall very solid file again- much like MITD 5, but with a more conventional layering and PR approach.
[The triplejacks aren’t actually that bad.]
Nice Streams/10
Mantle In The Dark 7:
I am lost for words.
I genuinely do not understand almost anything that is going on here.
Maybe I should take a look at this another time when it's not so late.
I don’t think 1am is the best time to try understanding this one.
Unhealthy Obsession with 24th Streams/10
Chart Order: 2 & 4, 3, 1
Group Notes:
Why are there not one, but two whole ass ITG Stamina charts???
Second Strike 1:
Not actually too fond of unnecessary index streams in my FFR files.
ITG Stamina/10
Second Strike 2:
Why Is Your Audio So Quiet???
Anyway ignoring that, actually an incredibly solid chart, flows great, very sound layering choices form a coherent experience with a consistent difficulty. Really fun to play.
Interesting colour theory(?)
I am not big brain enough to understand it so you do you I guess.
A little bit of a rough cut to the audio at the end, but there's not much you could do with this type of song.
Far In The Blue Sky colour scheme/10
Second Strike 3:
Hello ITG Stamina 2.
I see you’ve brought with you a couple 24th streams, and even some 32nd bursts, how daring.
ITG Stamina v2/10
Second Strike 4:
Another very solid chart, much like SS 2, but a bit more conservative on the minijack usage- both are perfectly valid approaches in my opinion.
Basically exactly what I would expect from this song. Great job.
Oh My Goodness Gracious An Actually Normal Chart Holy Shit/10
Chart Order: 1, 2, 3
Group Notes:
What an absolute banger of a class my goodness.
Smallest class, but by far the best too.
Memories in the Blue 1:
THANK YOU GOD FINALLY.
Congratulations on being the first chart so far that I have actually thoroughly enjoyed the entire way through oh my goodness gracious.
Excellent layering and pattern choice, consistency is on point, difficulty is moderately high but focuses more on short bursts or approachable patterns- making the entire chart quite approachable.
But most importantly, it's fun! Really fun actually!
The charter masterfully incorporates the bounciness of the song into the chart itself, and easily had me swaying side to side along with the music while playing.
Incredible work.
[Honestly a masterpiece of a chart. Hands down the best work in the entire stepcon.]
So Fun!!!/10
Memories in the Blue 2:
Another absolutely incredible chart.
This one focuses more on slightly longer bursts and sustained streams, which is a valid approach, however I do find shorter bursts to be slightly better suited to the punchiness of this song.
That said, this chart absolutely would have won my pick in any of the previous classes.
Absolute banger here. Great job.
So Fun!!/10
Memories in the Blue 3:
My goodness, yet another absolutely incredible chart.
In the first about 1/3 of the chart, there does seem to be just a little bit missing, feels like the chart isn’t quite as punchy as it should be- but it turns into near perfection for the other 2/3 of the chart, just like 1 and 2.
Unfortunately because of that lacking in the first third, I will place it ever-so-slightly lower than the other two, but again, this would have certainly won my pick in any other class.
Another amazing job. Well done.
[I definitely think this is the weakest of the three, much more so than on my initial playthrough. Still pretty good though]
Fun/10
Chart Order: 1, 6, 5, 4, 2, 3
Group Notes:
Actually some really cool charts in this group, weird cuts though.
GET OVER IT ! 1:
Excellent usage of repeating patterns throughout the entire chart, as well as excellent layering choices, abstraction choices, and PR.
Very, very fun to play.
My only nitpick is that one of the repeating burst patterns was a tad too fast for my taste, considering that it was quite an uncomfortable pattern.
Other than that, this chart is very near perfection.
[This really is an extraordinary chart with how it so cleanly directs your focus to certain parts of the song.
The weak part of this chart is definitely the dump section, which was pretty unclear with some of the abstraction choices, and certainly too hard compared to the rest of the chart.
If the stepartists of this and 6 combined forces, they would surely produce a truly perfect chart.]
FUN !/10
GET OVER IT ! 2:
An excellently put together minimalist chart, unfortunately I’m not going to vote for it when there’s a non-minimalist chart of the same quality available.
Minimalist (but actually quite good)/10
GET OVER IT ! 3:
Great chart, very fun to play, it's just that… It has a peculiar obsession with minijacks.
Usage of repeating patterns is once again excellent, however some abstraction choices and patterning choices (particularly with the dubstep-y section) was slightly strange to me, and didn’t flow as well as it could have.
MWC Map/10
GET OVER IT ! 4:
Yet another great chart.
Only slightly on the easier side this time, with great layering and usage of repeating patterns- even a sprinkling of tasteful and natural colour theory.
Importantly though, it lacks the punchyness and bursty fun of 1.
9/10
GET OVER IT ! 5:
Interesting choice to cut it.
Overall this is definitely my second favourite chart so far, it’s incredibly well put together and has just a bit more punchyness than 4, which makes it a strong contender indeed.
I am actually slightly saddened by the cut, I would have liked to play the rest of the song too.
[The cut is certainly less rough than I remember. I think in general this chart tried to do a little too much at once, I think that a less wholesome and more focused layering scheme would have been a slightly better choice. That’s not to say that this wasn’t executed well at all- in fact I very likely would have made an extremely similar style of chart, had I got this as my song.]
Cut Ver
/10GET OVER IT ! 6:
Interesting choice to do a fade-out. I think it works a little better than the previous cut at least.
Very strong chart overall, excellent use of repeating patterns, layering is sound, and it has the vitally important quality of punchyness.
My only issue is that a few (indeed, a very small amount) of the abstractions are somewhere between ‘slightly unclear’ and ‘unclear’.
Still, I think in general the abstract dump parts are ever-so-slightly cleaner than in GOI 1, which puts it on roughly the same level.
Very well done.
(Why did you have to fade it though I don’t get it).
[Rather than the abstractions being ‘unclear’, I think that there were actually a couple spots where there should have been some kind of dumpy thing. The parts that were dumped were exquisitely done, much better than GOI 1.
Other than those tiny parts, it's basically a flawless chart. My main issue is that it's cut! I want to play more of the chart why did you cut it!!!]
Alan Walker - Faded/10












- Tosh 2014








Comment