Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

[jimerax]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

Another news, I just made submission cap reqs a bit more tight (sorry Silvuh).

We'll use this for the next batch.

And if you have simfile author title, your submission cap is at least 3 unless you've got some penalties.

[Ziergdsx18]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

mfw

5 50-99pts - 6 100-199pts - 7 200pts or more - 8

rip

[jimerax]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

I thought higher reqs were way too easy. And if your submission cap is 5 or more, it's not that hard to get 10+ pts in one batch actually. We can just remove 6+ reqs like some people suggested, but this time I'm just making them harder.

And as for [--] things, [--]s are discouraging for new users for sure but I think they need to get their files checked by someone before submitting, at least. and if their reviews aren't that bad the file won't get [--]s, usually.

We need to add this comment instead.

"If you are new to simfile stepping, we highly recommend you to have experienced people check your simfiles before submitting here. If your file is extremely hopeless, you may get negative simfile artist points as a penalty here. And if most reviewers give your simfile positive feedbacks, your file has chance to get accepted to FFR."

[bmah]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

I'd just take out "If your file is extremely hopeless, you may get negative simfile artist points as a penalty here."

that's going to get people out the door immediately
the rules will speak about those sort of technicalities...but basically try to incite words of encouragement for new steppers

[jimerax]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

Those words aren't very good choices probably, but we need to explain about the risk anyways.

"If you are new to simfile stepping, we highly recommend you to have experienced people check your simfiles before submitting here. If you don't, you may get negative simfile artist points as a penalty here. And if most reviewers give your simfile positive feedbacks, your file has chance to get accepted to FFR."

[ScarletSky]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

I'm fairly confident in the two files I have ready. :3
I already know where I'll get bashed when they're reviewed, but I put those sections/patterns in there for a reason, so if it survives the bit of bashing for that, then it was well worth it. I don't think that the chart should always follow strict guidelines, because if they did that would kill the creativity that's put into the chart in the first place.
But then again, without guidelines and judges reviewing, anything could and would be put in game, no one wants to play a shitty chart. =/

Oh, and the videos on my page are pretty outdated as far as edits I've made to those charts up to now, but I've had a few people look at them and say they're pretty good. :3 If Razor, Middie, and the other person I'm waiting on all say they're good, then I'm content.

[bmah]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

Drop subconsciousness from easy batch conditional queue
I'm just going to re-send my all three easy batch entries to the new song artist batch
(They are all composed by the same person)

won't be happening I guess

tarolabo's in now...

[~Zero~]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

Do you guys still want my fix for system split that I was suppose to send like 8 months ago :3

[One Winged Angel]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

Quick question for all the judges and people in charge here

If I step a song for the next hard songs batch that's already included in the game (so a v2), would it still be given fair judgment and have an equal chance to be put in the game as any other file, or is the fact that the song is already included in FFR going to hinder its chances of getting in?

Just wondering

[TC_Halogen]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

My personal opinion is that a difficulty tag should be appended to the song title, like Blooddrunk [Heavy]. I'd only be more strict if the chart is to close to the older chart's difficulty.

[leonid]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

won't be happening I guess

tarolabo's in now...

tarolabo != guna

[Niala]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

As long as you're not re-stepping an FMO to an FMO or something then ya go ahead and submit a v2.

[psychoangel691]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

As long as you're not re-stepping an FMO to an FMO or something then ya go ahead and submit a v2.

^^

[One Winged Angel]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

I was thinking something along the lines of VC to FGO

Aite thanks guys~

[Silvuh]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

The Degradation of the Soul can be removed from the queue. I was talking with the track author, and he was saying he could work with the track more to make it either more suitable for an easier file. I was gon'na show him the file I made and where parts of the track could be smoother so the steps would be easier to follow for an unskilled player. Could also be made into a harder file, so I guess I'll see what happens. Just need to get him to download SM or something, which I haven't been persistent about.