Having trouble with Continuity crap.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 25thhour
    I like max
    • Feb 2007
    • 2922

    #1

    Having trouble with Continuity crap.

    This is the first problem

    f(x) { x + c , if x < 2
    { cx^2 + 1 , if x >= 2

    Find the values of the constant C so that f(x) is continous at x = 2

    So what I know is that for a function to be continous you need 3 things.

    f(x) must be defined, the limit must exist, and f(x) must equal the limit.

    First step I did was make both equations equal

    x + c = cx^2 + 1

    Next, I subbed x = 2 into the equation

    2 + c = 4c + 1

    Then I found c

    1 = 3c
    c = 1/3

    Now I subbed C back in to the equations to get

    x + 1/3
    and
    (1/3)x^2 + 1

    I then attempted to check points greater than or equal to two into the 2nd function (2) and points less than 2 (0) into the first function. (This is where I don't know what I am doing)

    I get 7/3 for the 2nd one
    and 1/3 for the first.

    They dont equal so this can't work... I am confused.
    r bae adam bae max bae bridget bae claudia bae trevor bae adam2 bae mayo bae keith bae
  • 25thhour
    I like max
    • Feb 2007
    • 2922

    #2
    Re: Having trouble with Continuity crap.

    Oh man, I just got it... Fuckin durp...

    Okay, Lol.

    Instead of testing points. I made sure the function was defined at 2 (it was 7/3)
    Then I took the limits at 2 from the negative and the positive, they both equaled 7/3.

    yay it worked


    C = 1/3

    EDIT:

    I do have one more problem I will post in a bit
    r bae adam bae max bae bridget bae claudia bae trevor bae adam2 bae mayo bae keith bae

    Comment

    • iCeCuBEz v2
      XFD
      • Mar 2008
      • 4924

      #3
      Re: Having trouble with Continuity crap.

      gj
      I bring my math homework to church. It helps me find a higher power.

      Dennis, Nell, Edna, Leon, Nedra, Anita, Rolf, Nora, Alice, Carol, Leo, Jane, Reed, Dena, Dale, Basil, Rae, Penny, Lana, Dave, Denny, Lena, Ida, Bernadette, Ben, Ray, Lila, Nina, Jo, Ira, Mara, Sara, Mario, Jan, Ina, Lily, Arne, Bette, Dan, Reba, Diane, Lynn, Ed, Eva, Dana, Lynne, Pearl, Isabel, Ada, Ned, Dee, Rena, Joel, Lora, Cecil, Aaron, Flora, Tina, Arden, Noel, and Ellen sinned.

      Comment

      • 25thhour
        I like max
        • Feb 2007
        • 2922

        #4
        Re: Having trouble with Continuity crap.

        I do have one more problem that is just limits at infinity:

        lim x-> -inf [sqrt(x^2 + 4) - cubedroot(8x^3 + x - 15)] / (4x - 5)

        so what I got was -1/4 because since when you simplify the highest power is x^1 you take the coefficients 1 - 2 = -1 and put it over the bottom 4.

        I would like someone to check this please as wolfram gets a wonky ass answer.
        r bae adam bae max bae bridget bae claudia bae trevor bae adam2 bae mayo bae keith bae

        Comment

        • Zapmeister
          FFR Player
          • Sep 2012
          • 466

          #5
          Re: Having trouble with Continuity crap.

          copying and pasting your thingy into wolfram alpha gives -3/4, and if you tell it to substitute x= -1000000 or something it gives a close enough answer.

          the discrepancy you're having is to do with the signs in the term with the sqrt in it. that's because sqrt(x^2) isn't x, it's |x|. so when you "take the highest power" you get sqrt(x^2 + 4) / (4x-5) --> |x| / (4x) --> -1/4 as x--> -inf.

          alternatively if you start with sqrt(x^2 + 4) / (4x-5) and divide top and bottom by |x| you get sqrt(1 + 4x^-2) / (4 sgn[x] -5/|x|) which goes to -1/4 as x --> -inf.

          you don't need to worry about anything like this for the cubed root term because the cube root function is one-to-one and cuberoot(x^3) = x for all x, so that bit is fine.
          Last edited by Zapmeister; 09-23-2013, 12:12 PM. Reason: typos

          Theorem: If you have a large enough number of monkeys, and a large enough number of computer keyboards, one of them will sight-read AAA death piano on stealth. And the ffr community will forever worship it. Proof Example

          ask me anything here

          mashed FCs: 329

          r1: 5
          r2: 4
          r3: 6
          r4: 8
          r5: 3
          r6: 5
          r7: 15
          final position: 4th

          Comment

          • benguino
            Kawaii Desu Ne?
            • Dec 2007
            • 4186

            #6
            Re: Having trouble with Continuity crap.

            @25th: I sent you an FFR PM with some help for that second problem (sometimes I'm self-conscious about posting math in the ffr forums and I decide I don't want to)
            AMA: http://ask.fm/benguino


            Originally posted by Spenner
            (^)> peck peck says the heels
            Originally posted by Xx{Midnight}xX
            And god made ben, and realized he was doomed to miss. And said it was good.
            Originally posted by Zakvvv666
            awww :< crushing my dreams; was looking foward to you attempting to shoot yourself point blank and missing

            Comment

            • 25thhour
              I like max
              • Feb 2007
              • 2922

              #7
              Re: Having trouble with Continuity crap.

              Ben I never received the PM.

              Im confused about the absolute value? Why does it change to -3/4? Am I just accidently switching signs? Should it actually be -1? because it is the absolute value of x x being an absolute value?
              r bae adam bae max bae bridget bae claudia bae trevor bae adam2 bae mayo bae keith bae

              Comment

              • Zapmeister
                FFR Player
                • Sep 2012
                • 466

                #8
                Re: Having trouble with Continuity crap.

                ok, let's put it this way.

                lim x-> -inf [sqrt(x^2 + 4) - cubedroot(8x^3 + x - 15)] / (4x - 5)

                let's split it up into two bits.

                lim x-> -inf [sqrt(x^2 + 4)] / (4x - 5) - lim x-> -inf [cubedroot(8x^3 + x - 15)] / (4x - 5)

                look at the first bit, lim x-> -inf [sqrt(x^2 + 4)] / (4x - 5)

                what happens if x becomes *really* negative? try x = -million. then sqrt(x^2+4) = sqrt (trillion and 4) = like a million, and (4x - 5) is like -4 million, so you suspect the limit of that bit should be -1/4.

                what i think you're trying to write is [sqrt(x^2 + 4)] --> x, and (4x - 5) --> 4x, and you get x / 4x = 1/4. what happened to the minus sign?

                the problem here is that sqrt(x^2) = |x|, not x. if you square a big negative number and square root it, you get the positive of what you started with, since square root is defined to always be positive. for instance, if you had x=3, sqrt(x^2)=3. but if you had x=-3, sqrt(x^2)=3 also.

                so when you "take the highest power" in the numerator, you should do [sqrt(x^2 + 4)] --> |x| instead. then, the denominator goes to 4x, and what you have is |x| / 4x. when you have x negative, |x|/x is -1, so this is -1/4.

                lim x-> -inf [sqrt(x^2 + 4)] / (4x - 5) = -1/4

                for the second term, cubedroot(8x^3 + x - 15) is close to cubedroot(8x^3), or 2 cuberoot(x^3) for large x. here you don't have to do that again, because cuberoot(x^3) = x for all x. this is because each real number always has exactly one cube root.

                let me know if you're still confused

                Theorem: If you have a large enough number of monkeys, and a large enough number of computer keyboards, one of them will sight-read AAA death piano on stealth. And the ffr community will forever worship it. Proof Example

                ask me anything here

                mashed FCs: 329

                r1: 5
                r2: 4
                r3: 6
                r4: 8
                r5: 3
                r6: 5
                r7: 15
                final position: 4th

                Comment

                • 25thhour
                  I like max
                  • Feb 2007
                  • 2922

                  #9
                  Re: Having trouble with Continuity crap.

                  Originally posted by Zapmeister
                  ok, let's put it this way.

                  lim x-> -inf [sqrt(x^2 + 4) - cubedroot(8x^3 + x - 15)] / (4x - 5)

                  let's split it up into two bits.

                  lim x-> -inf [sqrt(x^2 + 4)] / (4x - 5) - lim x-> -inf [cubedroot(8x^3 + x - 15)] / (4x - 5)

                  look at the first bit, lim x-> -inf [sqrt(x^2 + 4)] / (4x - 5)

                  what happens if x becomes *really* negative? try x = -million. then sqrt(x^2+4) = sqrt (trillion and 4) = like a million, and (4x - 5) is like -4 million, so you suspect the limit of that bit should be -1/4.

                  what i think you're trying to write is [sqrt(x^2 + 4)] --> x, and (4x - 5) --> 4x, and you get x / 4x = 1/4. what happened to the minus sign?

                  the problem here is that sqrt(x^2) = |x|, not x. if you square a big negative number and square root it, you get the positive of what you started with, since square root is defined to always be positive. for instance, if you had x=3, sqrt(x^2)=3. but if you had x=-3, sqrt(x^2)=3 also.

                  so when you "take the highest power" in the numerator, you should do [sqrt(x^2 + 4)] --> |x| instead. then, the denominator goes to 4x, and what you have is |x| / 4x. when you have x negative, |x|/x is -1, so this is -1/4.

                  lim x-> -inf [sqrt(x^2 + 4)] / (4x - 5) = -1/4

                  for the second term, cubedroot(8x^3 + x - 15) is close to cubedroot(8x^3), or 2 cuberoot(x^3) for large x. here you don't have to do that again, because cuberoot(x^3) = x for all x. this is because each real number always has exactly one cube root.

                  let me know if you're still confused
                  I think I remember covering it in class now, something about when you squareroot x^2 you get like -|x| when what you were supposed to substitute in was negative.
                  r bae adam bae max bae bridget bae claudia bae trevor bae adam2 bae mayo bae keith bae

                  Comment

                  • Arkuski
                    FFR Veteran
                    • Jul 2006
                    • 1118

                    #10
                    Re: Having trouble with Continuity crap.

                    Now prove continuity using epsilon-delta notation

                    Originally posted by Wayward Vagabond
                    i can appreciate a good looking woman when i see one and this one just happened to be my mom

                    Comment

                    Working...