"1984" was an autocratic dystopia. The main themes were oppression, invasion of privacy, dumbing down of society, and government corruption rather than an economical plan based on equal distribution.
This is a pretty interesting proxy-communist movie that shows how the philosophy is a lot deeper and more interesting than one would initially assume.
At the very least, watching it may expand your mental horizons beyond a dichotomy between Capitalism and Communism where they span the poles between "good" and "bad."
Communism is wrong because you lose your sense of individuality because you have people controlling what you wear, how you feel, what you can and can't learn about, and they choose your religion and if you go against their rules it's the Ax for you... Read George Orwell's 1984 it explains what it's like under "Big Brother's" (Government's) rule and what it's like to be communist and what happens when you go against them and while you're at reading that, read George Orwell's Animal Farm again it explains everything so this way it teaches why communism is bad and everything... hope this helped
Spread kindness, you never know what a person's going through behind closed doors.
It helped especially in light of the post several posts above pointing out that 1984 has nothing at all to do with communism. Which is to say it didn't help.
1984 had lots to do with Communism if you think about it a Communist rule is also known as a Totalitarianistic rule which means one person, in 1984's case "Big Brother", is there to make sure you follow the rules of Communism and if you don't follow, you're made an "Unperson" or killed for that matter so if you read it closely and understand what it's saying then you would understand that it IS about Communism but I also mentioned Animal Farm so it should have helped looks like there are a lot of people out here that doesn't understand George Orwell's literature and it's relation to Communism -.-
Spread kindness, you never know what a person's going through behind closed doors.
I just think the sense of individualism in America is strong so an idea like Communism doesn't appeal to people who already have money. Those who struggle in Capitalism would start to enjoy the idea of Communism unless they otherwise think they can climb the ladder. That's probably why it started to become a growing idea in America because most people are actually not very well off here. There are plenty of socialist programs we use in America, as well. People enjoy those and ask for them without knowing that Socialism has some connection to Communism. If I'm wrong about something, feel free to correct me.
I just think the sense of individualism in America is strong so an idea like Communism doesn't appeal to people who already have money. Those who struggle in Capitalism would start to enjoy the idea of Communism unless they otherwise think they can climb the ladder. That's probably why it started to become a growing idea in America because most people are actually not very well off here. There are plenty of socialist programs we use in America, as well. People enjoy those and ask for them without knowing that Socialism has some connection to Communism. If I'm wrong about something, feel free to correct me.
What you say all makes sense, and I'm sure is how some people are, but yet I still have to question why you think people must always have solely, individual selfish reasons for believing something? People are capable of thinking beyond themselves and what something means for themselves you know. Afterall, if you can logically infer things about others, others can infer the same things that happen to other people. Not every opinion someone has is deepseated in improving their own selves. Or if if is, then that self-improvement could be based upon doing things like helping others, or trying to figure out the world in the way that makes the most sense, and therefore such things supersede an individual's need to have more money or feel safe, or whatever else you think ultimately drives people.
I'm sure there are wealthy people out there who believe in communism, but for some reason I think you'd think those people must have some sort of alteriour motive for wanting communism, like thinking they could somehow do better by taking advantage of the system.
Besides which, I thought the idea of communism took hold in the US during the 50's where, so I've heard, the middle-class was much larger, and if this is true, then your reasons are somewhat invalid.
Sorry, this is a tangent. I'm upset about other stuff where apparently I must have deep-seated fear of not having a spirit because I'm a dualist, and you are applying the same principles that you used for me, in determining why someone would support communism.
What you say all makes sense, and I'm sure is how some people are, but yet I still have to question why you think people must always have solely, individual selfish reasons for believing something? People are capable of thinking beyond themselves and what something means for themselves you know. Afterall, if you can logically infer things about others, others can infer the same things that happen to other people. Not every opinion someone has is deepseated in improving their own selves. Or if if is, then that self-improvement could be based upon doing things like helping others, or trying to figure out the world in the way that makes the most sense, and therefore such things supersede an individual's need to have more money or feel safe, or whatever else you think ultimately drives people.
I'm sure there are wealthy people out there who believe in communism, but for some reason I think you'd think those people must have some sort of alteriour motive for wanting communism, like thinking they could somehow do better by taking advantage of the system.
Besides which, I thought the idea of communism took hold in the US during the 50's where, so I've heard, the middle-class was much larger, and if this is true, then your reasons are somewhat invalid.
Sorry, this is a tangent. I'm upset about other stuff where apparently I must have deep-seated fear of not having a spirit because I'm a dualist, and you are applying the same principles that you used for me, in determining why someone would support communism.
A few things... I never said anything about people solely being selfish, I did not assume that there's no such thing as somebody who did not only work at improving themselves. In America, it's a lot more prevalent. Also, wealthy people are LESS LIKELY to give in to the idea of Communism.
Even if we say a majority of people are middle class, there's also a lot of people below middle class. I don't remember the exact numbers, but it gets pretty large and middle class people sometimes have the illusion that they aren't as well off as they think they are. Many people who are of lower class think they might be middle class, as well. It kind of gets confusing there, but that's not the point. It boils down to the overall condition we have in America and how Capitalism creates a large gap between the "haves" and "have nots".
I don't have the proper knowledge to tell you if everyone is inherently selfish and only act for others based on their own personal gain or not, but I believe it is possible that no person truly is unselfish.
1984 had lots to do with Communism if you think about it a Communist rule is also known as a Totalitarianistic rule which means one person, in 1984's case "Big Brother", is there to make sure you follow the rules of Communism and if you don't follow, you're made an "Unperson" or killed for that matter so if you read it closely and understand what it's saying then you would understand that it IS about Communism but I also mentioned Animal Farm so it should have helped looks like there are a lot of people out here that doesn't understand George Orwell's literature and it's relation to Communism -.-
Communist "Rule" is a meaningless term, nobody rules a communist state. If there is a Totalitarianism, you do not have a communism. You are misusing the term and equating two things which are not equal. An actual functioning communist state has no 'Big Brother' or need for one. Intrinsic in actual communism is a vested interest in that system from everyone in it.
If you don't follow the rules, you are simply not a part of that community. I can't see a reason why you would -need- to be killed in that case, unless you decided to try and still take resources by violence or force of arms.
1984 does not describe a communist state. Full stop.
Most people in this thread seem to have formed their idea of what communism is from Cold War propaganda. Communism is an economical system and nothing more. It doesn't mean you're restricted to a certain religion or you loose you individuality, it just means equal distribution of wealth very simply put.
Most people in this thread seem to have formed their idea of what communism is from Cold War propaganda. Communism is an economical system and nothing more. It doesn't mean you're restricted to a certain religion or you loose you individuality, it just means equal distribution of wealth very simply put.
yes exactly. I don't think the human race will make it past this century if we don't start adressing the wealth distribution problem. We suck for doing nothing about it.
Most people in this thread seem to have formed their idea of what communism is from Cold War propaganda. Communism is an economical system and nothing more. It doesn't mean you're restricted to a certain religion or you loose you individuality, it just means equal distribution of wealth very simply put.
That's a point hard to convey to others. I don't understand what's difficult to understand about that.
Comment