Re: The Ideal Government
Money is an absolute matter. Human is not.
Moreover, it doesn't work like that, doing such a thing will inevitably end in a high imbalance, like one of my friend said, Marx wrote an utopist fiction, sure it was intelligent, but it could never be adapted in the reality. Don't try to fight fire by using a blowtorch, the fact the flame is different doesn't mean it isn't fire. It's why e based our system on a stable and "total" idea : money.
The current "capitalist" society runs on debt, not money. Eventually it will crash.
Also utopist is not a real word.
"But the problem isn't about the world being "smaller" because the distance between each human being have been rigorously reducted. All is about quantity of the population. Communism can only work between people that believe in the same thing, it's why it needs censor and propaganda to keep being "working" with a such quantity of humans.
As long as a system needs to "maintain" the thoughts of its citizens, the system is reprehensible."
The same thing applies to all forms of government policies and ideas. Although you tend to believe you may have the right to "freedom of speech", that is a gross illusion.
"Wrong. In a communist system, the only source of power is in the government hands. Just go visit North Korea, and tell me if you think the people out there have a power on their government. They're handled like machines by the state, it's perfectly immoral. Anarchy hasn't any state (well, from there, you can say the state is in each person), but Communism has one. Otherwise, they wouldn't have any leader."
No in an actual Marx based utopian communist society it would revolve around public demand, not politicians placing their own rules and laws, as well as ruling with "power". It would be considered living truly at peace with little to no conflicts, and the conflicts are often minor.
North Korea is a dictatorship. A dictatorship/totalitarian society is not communism. If it were, then the so-called head of state would only be allowed to the same privileges as everyone else, the same pay, house, food, access to resources.
"Uh.. Sounds like democracy to me. Except in democracy, the maximum of people can live according to his needs and lead their life like they want to, they are free."
Nobody is ever free. That is another illusion. You are expected to endure responsibilities. In communism this is more enforced and hence, rejected since people wish to do whatever they want, in any form of government except in a state of anarchy. There you work by yourself and perhaps the help of others (if they want to) to live. Eventually the state of anarchy will actually become conservative and start changing and becoming more organized, or the state of anarchy will crash.
"Just think about something : This is utopist. You could never introduce the absolute of equality in a human system that isn't made to carry it. The human being needs poorer people than him so he can live.
Look at ants, they can perfectly live with a mechanic system like that, ants are communist. But why are they living in this system without any problem ? Because they aren't aware of themselves. They can't put anything in question. They aren't irregular in themselves. They just do what they have to do because they can't do anything else."
Not true at all. If the concept of a regulated currency was abolished then there would be no "poor" people. There would just be the people who work and those who don't work. There does not need to be someone who is lacking funds in order to sustain their life in order to support the upper classes. This is one big problem that has occurred in capitalism due to the fact that the opportunity to gain was exploited by individuals so suddenly the masses are now stuck where they are. The class system was changed from "royalty" to "wealthy" with only a handful of individuals controlling most of the populace, and also trying to change the opinions of the populace.
Ants are not communist. They are aware of themselves, all organisms to some degree are aware of their own existence, otherwise they would have no will and would die off quickly.
Ants work to live like all creatures, and because ants do not have to worry about doing anything else other than to live and sustain their species like all organisms (all organisms came from bacteria or single-celled organisms that multiplied in order to live, this would suggest that we, as humans, are the last evolved forms of bacteria, explaining the need to take over and live as the individual wants to). As a side note, ant colonies, along with bee colonies work under the direction of a queen.
Money is an absolute matter. Human is not.
Moreover, it doesn't work like that, doing such a thing will inevitably end in a high imbalance, like one of my friend said, Marx wrote an utopist fiction, sure it was intelligent, but it could never be adapted in the reality. Don't try to fight fire by using a blowtorch, the fact the flame is different doesn't mean it isn't fire. It's why e based our system on a stable and "total" idea : money.
The current "capitalist" society runs on debt, not money. Eventually it will crash.
Also utopist is not a real word.
"But the problem isn't about the world being "smaller" because the distance between each human being have been rigorously reducted. All is about quantity of the population. Communism can only work between people that believe in the same thing, it's why it needs censor and propaganda to keep being "working" with a such quantity of humans.
As long as a system needs to "maintain" the thoughts of its citizens, the system is reprehensible."
The same thing applies to all forms of government policies and ideas. Although you tend to believe you may have the right to "freedom of speech", that is a gross illusion.
"Wrong. In a communist system, the only source of power is in the government hands. Just go visit North Korea, and tell me if you think the people out there have a power on their government. They're handled like machines by the state, it's perfectly immoral. Anarchy hasn't any state (well, from there, you can say the state is in each person), but Communism has one. Otherwise, they wouldn't have any leader."
No in an actual Marx based utopian communist society it would revolve around public demand, not politicians placing their own rules and laws, as well as ruling with "power". It would be considered living truly at peace with little to no conflicts, and the conflicts are often minor.
North Korea is a dictatorship. A dictatorship/totalitarian society is not communism. If it were, then the so-called head of state would only be allowed to the same privileges as everyone else, the same pay, house, food, access to resources.
"Uh.. Sounds like democracy to me. Except in democracy, the maximum of people can live according to his needs and lead their life like they want to, they are free."
Nobody is ever free. That is another illusion. You are expected to endure responsibilities. In communism this is more enforced and hence, rejected since people wish to do whatever they want, in any form of government except in a state of anarchy. There you work by yourself and perhaps the help of others (if they want to) to live. Eventually the state of anarchy will actually become conservative and start changing and becoming more organized, or the state of anarchy will crash.
"Just think about something : This is utopist. You could never introduce the absolute of equality in a human system that isn't made to carry it. The human being needs poorer people than him so he can live.
Look at ants, they can perfectly live with a mechanic system like that, ants are communist. But why are they living in this system without any problem ? Because they aren't aware of themselves. They can't put anything in question. They aren't irregular in themselves. They just do what they have to do because they can't do anything else."
Not true at all. If the concept of a regulated currency was abolished then there would be no "poor" people. There would just be the people who work and those who don't work. There does not need to be someone who is lacking funds in order to sustain their life in order to support the upper classes. This is one big problem that has occurred in capitalism due to the fact that the opportunity to gain was exploited by individuals so suddenly the masses are now stuck where they are. The class system was changed from "royalty" to "wealthy" with only a handful of individuals controlling most of the populace, and also trying to change the opinions of the populace.
Ants are not communist. They are aware of themselves, all organisms to some degree are aware of their own existence, otherwise they would have no will and would die off quickly.
Ants work to live like all creatures, and because ants do not have to worry about doing anything else other than to live and sustain their species like all organisms (all organisms came from bacteria or single-celled organisms that multiplied in order to live, this would suggest that we, as humans, are the last evolved forms of bacteria, explaining the need to take over and live as the individual wants to). As a side note, ant colonies, along with bee colonies work under the direction of a queen.
Comment