Gay Churches?

[jewpinthethird]

Re: Gay Churches?

It was a rhetorical question, jewp.

--Guido

http://andy.mikee385.com

Rhetorical questions only inspire awe in fools and ignoramuses.

"Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination."

So, what if a man is raped by another man? Against his will and wishes. It it still an abomination worthy of being punished?

[GuidoHunter]

Re: Gay Churches?

Rhetorical questions only inspire awe in fools and ignoramuses.

Be that so, it was still a tool for rhetoric, not inspiring awe.

"Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination."

So, what if a man is raped by another man? Against his will and wishes. It it still an abomination worthy of being punished?

If God intended "lying with a woman" to mean "raping her", then you might have an argument. Something tells me that that's not right, though.

Also, jewp, you're getting terribly off-topic in here. I know that you have all sorts of vitriol bottled up for any sort of antireligious argument you might be able to strike up, but whether or not homosexuality is or should be a sin isn't the least bit germane to the OP.

--Guido

http://andy.mikee385.com

[atalkingcow]

Re: Gay Churches?

Why do men have nipples? Your argument isn't logical if you're suggesting that because prostate stimulation is sexually exciting God thus condones homosexuality. There's a GIANT gap in there that you just jumped across without considering.

Also recall that anal sex with a woman is sinful, too, so that's not just a concern of homosexuality.

The Bible is very clear on why homosexuality is sinful, regardless of how "normal" it might be (which, again, you'll be hard pressed to prove).



The Bible: "I assume that I am correct because there are some small bits of history inside of me. The people who wrote me believed that the voices in their heads were actually angels and or God him/herself. My wording has been changed, changed back, and changed again. Once a year, someone comes up with yet another alternative interpretation of my meaning. I maintain that there is a God, and this God at one point was directly involved with the goings on of the Planet Earth, but suddenly decided to stop showing that He actually exists."

Science: "By definition, we never deal with religious matters. Period. End of story.This would be because religious matters cannot be analyzed. Religion cannot be proven or disproven 100% without a shadow of a doubt."

I think my source is better.

--Guido

http://andy.mikee385.com

Fixed.

[devonin]

Re: Gay Churches?

Fixed.

Locked.