If you want to name something or show something that holds some sort of importance chronologically, then I can see someone opting out of using the shorthand. Like I said, there's nothing that physically says it's wrong.
If you're using it to prove a fact or something along those lines, then you could say something like: two thousand and ten years ago (or whatever number you'd like).
Why people continue to insist on there being a correct/incorrect way, rather than a long/short way, I don't understand.
I personally think there doesn't need to be a "correct" way to pronounce years; that is, I feel it's acceptable for one to read "1999" as "nineteen ninety-nine" and "2005" as "two thousand five."
That's how I'd probably read these, too, if someone told me to read it without giving much thought about it.
/2cents
Goodbye and good riddance, military service (February 23, 2015 ~ February 22, 2017)
Project Sekai 535
It is pronounced Twenty-Eleven. The Year 2000 is actually pronounced the year Twenty-Hundred as well along with Twent-Oh-One and Twenty-Oh-Two as we did Nineteen-Hundred and Nineteen-Oh-One etc...
The pronunciation got messed up by the change in the opening digits from a teen number and the fact that popular culture was already saying the year 2000 and 2001 from movies such as 2001: A Space Odyssey.
If you think it should be pronounced Two Thousand Eleven, then you must also think it should be pronounced the year One Thousand Nine Hundred and Ninety Nine (1999) or the Year Two Thousand Five Hundred and Fifty Three (2553), right?
Comment