I was actually pretty surprised to hear this. First of all, we've known for a decent while that Pluto shouldn't be a planet simply because were it discovered today we would dub it a Kuyper Belt Object. But, I figured we'd never demote it just because we've gone and called it a planet for decades and changing it wouldn't really do much good, but it would be a pain in the ass to change everything.
THEN, I heard recently that there were deliberations to up our planet count to TWELVE. Some committee was going to actually set down a definition of what a planet is. The three criteria would be:
It's sufficiently big so that its shape is defined by its internal gravity and not by its material composition
It's not big enough to have nuclear fusion going on in its core (it's not a star)
It goes 'round a star and not a planet
This would jave added the biggest asteroid in the asteroid belt, Ceres; Pluto's "moon" Charon (in some weird occurrance, the center of rotation of Pluto and Charon is outside of Pluto's surface, so they both revolve around some invisible point, instead of Charon revolving around Pluto, as does our moon about us; and 2003 UB313, better known as Xena, with its moon Gabrielle.
But apparently that fell through, and they just cut Pluto out. =\
I've agreed for a long time that if you'll consider Pluto a planet, you have to add more. Frankly, I don't want to have to know more about crap we can hardly see when taking gen. ed Astronomy.
Then again, whenever we got to Pluto it was like, "Ok. Pluto. It's small. It's icy. Has this odd orbit. Passes Neptune. That's about all we know."
They changed the pneumonic device to "My Very Excellent Mother Just Served Us Nachos" Or something like that...>_< I heard about this in the news a couple days ago as well
Omega owes me [1] omega favor I am God of Hot Pockets, fear my fillings for they may be hot.
Originally posted by Synthlight
I hate myself.
Cheers,
Synthlight
xxpla tonic love: GIVE IT TO ME
xxpla tonic love: ****ing give it to me
I've agreed for a long time that if you'll consider Pluto a planet, you have to add more.
If it meant having a good, concrete definition of a planet, then yes, I'd rather have more planets.
I disagree with your second statement, though. Though we SHOULD add more pluto-like planets, there's nothing to say we HAD to. Sort of like house rules in a board game, viz. "well, we were wrong when we discovered it, but we were dumb back then, so we'll just keep it as is to avoid complicating things and not make that mistake in the future."
Originally posted by vash
pneumonic device
Amazing how much humor one extraneous u can add to a phrase... Erm, and the wrong beginning letter...
Also, there's not one official mnemonic. I learned "My Very Elegant Mother Joined Some Un-Necessary Program."
Like with Kingdom, Phylum, Class, Order, Family, Genus, Species, you could use what they teach you in class: "King Philip Crossed Over From German Soil", or you could use what TV Funhouse taught: "Kyle, Please Come Over For Gay Sex." The latter works better for me.
Comment