9/11 Planned or Real?

[cC@Zz]

Re: 9/11 Planned or Real?

It was faked.

All done at a sound stage in Orlando.

how did the towers get destroyed if it was all done at a sound stage?

[GuidoHunter]

Re: 9/11 Planned or Real?

I sent him an email about it. I told him his "evidence" that Dylan Avery is alive means that the thing is fake is bull****. Don't you think people would get suspicious if Dylan Avery and his friends and family all suddenly died? It would make it a giveaway that the government actually were trying to hide something, that's why Dylan is alive (if the movies are true...which i'm not saying they ARE, but maddox's evidence and stance on the topic is retarded).

You do realize that you're talking about maddox, here, don't you? Do you REALLY expect high-quality arguments? Or would you expect to see humorous ones?

So, Wilkin, you believe a handful of the insane claims made in the video and that somehow makes your opinion somehow more credible than that of the people who believe everything?

--Guido

http://andy.mikee385.com

[-Izzy-]

Re: 9/11 Planned or Real?

I think its stupid that they are making a movie about 9/11

[GuidoHunter]

Re: 9/11 Planned or Real?

"They are making"? They HAVE MADE two already, and why is it stupid?

--Guido

http://andy.mikee385.com

[T0rajir0u]

Re: 9/11 Planned or Real?

how did the towers get destroyed if it was all done at a sound stage?

TOTAL SARCASM FAILURE

[cC@Zz]

Re: 9/11 Planned or Real?

TOTAL SARCASM FAILURE

i wasnt being sarcastic

[GuidoHunter]

Re: 9/11 Planned or Real?

Oh wow, cC, are you ever dense...

--Guido

http://andy.mikee385.com

[Afrobean]

Re: 9/11 Planned or Real?

What Wilkin said took it way too far. They may have known about it beforehand. They DID use it to rally Americans behind invading Afghanistan and, under false pretenses, Iraq.

But to say that they knew ENOUGH about it (ie date, time, exact location) to plant explosives to aid in the destruction of the tower is completely retarded. I've seen a few shows on History Channel (or possibly Discovery Channel) about the fall and I think it's pretty clear that the towers didn't need explosives to go down. There were fires which burned hot enough to soften the skeleton of the structure. It was that melting of the key elements of the structure that brought it down, not explosives.

The only suspicious thing is that the building went relatively strait on it's way down. But think about it. They didn't fall because of the planes hitting them. They took those hits without a problem. They fell from the inside. Because there was no lateral force on it at the time it began it's fall, they went pretty much strait down.

[emptiness]

Re: 9/11 Planned or Real?

Security was lazy that day

[Kilgamayan]

Re: 9/11 Planned or Real?

Dinosaurs aren't extinct, that's a lie planted by the government. They're really hiding under Michael Moore's sofa cushions.

[purplepopcorn]

Re: 9/11 Planned or Real?

If anyone has the Penn and Teller short on their HD about this, now would be a good time to host it.

[Afrobean]

Re: 9/11 Planned or Real?

If anyone has the Penn and Teller short on their HD about this, now would be a good time to host it.

It's probably on youtube or google video if it's any good. I'll check for it right now.

EDIT: this looks like it is it http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...+teller+9%2F11

[jewpinthethird]

Re: 9/11 Planned or Real?

how did the towers get destroyed if it was all done at a sound stage?

Easy. The towers never existed. It makes perfect sense. Have you ever seen the Twin Towers in person? Of course not! Nobody did. Ever. Because they didnt exist.

PS. The Moon doesnt exist either.

This is a fact.

[falconsfan14]

Re: 9/11 Planned or Real?

lol.

[JurseyRider734]

Re: 9/11 Planned or Real?

What Wilkin said took it way too far. They may have known about it beforehand. They DID use it to rally Americans behind invading Afghanistan and, under false pretenses, Iraq.

But to say that they knew ENOUGH about it (ie date, time, exact location) to plant explosives to aid in the destruction of the tower is completely retarded. I've seen a few shows on History Channel (or possibly Discovery Channel) about the fall and I think it's pretty clear that the towers didn't need explosives to go down. There were fires which burned hot enough to soften the skeleton of the structure. It was that melting of the key elements of the structure that brought it down, not explosives.

The only suspicious thing is that the building went relatively strait on it's way down. But think about it. They didn't fall because of the planes hitting them. They took those hits without a problem. They fell from the inside. Because there was no lateral force on it at the time it began it's fall, they went pretty much strait down.

I'm pretty sure the guy did the science in the Loose Change video and it said the steel they used to make the towers wouldnt melt under the heat of a fire.

And i'm pretty sure I remember him getting some kind of sound clip or letter or something from an employee saying that security guards came in and told everyone to leave for a day or two or something. OMG PLANTING BOMBS IN ELEVATORS.

The point is...the video DOES make somewhat of a point...and why would Dylan Avery make this to try and fool people? He goes around and does screenings of the damn thing. By now, he would have just been like "lol u guys are idiotz trixd".