What? I'm pretty sure you just invented the term "adjectival participle". "Risen" in the sentence "he is risen" is just a participle being used as an adjective. It's neither an "adjectival" participle nor a "verbal" participle; it's just a participle, regardless of its use in the sentence.
Secondly, what in the hell is wrong with "he has risen"? Abso-freakin'-lutely nothing. It's perfectly grammatical. It's even a straightforward conjugation:
present: he rises
past: he rose
present participle: he is rising
past participle: he has risen.
The "he is/has risen" question is merely an example about the multiple possible uses of a participle.
Sorry for long-assed bump... however, hate to tell you:
Different types of participles:
Verbal
Adjectival
Adverbial
Those are pretty much it, but still.
Maybe in Russian or Hungarian, but this isn't a thread about linguistics; it's about English grammar.
We have present and past participles and the such, which act like verbs and adjectives, but we make no real distinction between verbal or adverbial participles.
My Polish Linguisitcs is weak, so I hadn't ever heard of those terms. Thanks for picking nits, though.
Maybe in Russian or Hungarian, but this isn't a thread about linguistics; it's about English grammar.
We have present and past participles and the such, which act like verbs and adjectives, but we make no real distinction between verbal or adverbial participles.
My Polish Linguisitcs is weak, so I hadn't ever heard of those terms. Thanks for picking nits, though.
Comment