First I have to tell you to read the stickies and now I have to tell you to read the rules?
Reaper...
--Guido
Really? Ok, I'm curious, can you link me to where someone has stated that in the rules?
I honestly believed that it was not a rule to have to type completely and grammatically correct.
See, the closest I can find is:
Frequent use of text speak (omissions and substitutions of letters in words in order to shorten them; excessive use of Internet acronyms).
But that only warrants a warning, and is not a bannable offense. Also, it's a frequent usage. So it's not really a rule to always be using good grammar / spelling.
Though that's just my interpretation of that. You tell me otherwise, or if I've missed something?
Like I said in it, yes, it's a warnable offence. But is it really a rule that you must always use good spelling and grammar? That to me is more of a guideline, you don't have to always follow it.
A rule you must always follow.
People break spelling / grammar all the time, yet they aren't warned (to my knowledge, PM's are beyond my knowledge) or really reprimanded for doing it, because it's generally accepted in small doses.
@Reaper: If you get a warning and keep doing it, you can get banned. Just because the punishment isn't an outright ban doesn't mean it's any less of a rule, anyway.
And I DO PM people if they use excessively bad speech. Typically it never gets to the ban stage (though it has before, especially in CT, where it's more heavily enforced).
@Pscho: Yeah, Squeek does love all the formalities of written English. =)
@Reaper: If you get a warning and keep doing it, you can get banned. Just because the punishment isn't an outright ban doesn't mean it's any less of a rule, anyway.
Point taken.
And I DO PM people if they use excessively bad speech. Typically it never gets to the ban stage (though it has before, especially in CT, where it's more heavily enforced).
Well, I did say I didn't know, so I wasn't presuming or anything, I know you do a good job man, no worries.
@Reaper: If you get a warning and keep doing it, you can get banned. Just because the punishment isn't an outright ban doesn't mean it's any less of a rule, anyway.
And I DO PM people if they use excessively bad speech. Typically it never gets to the ban stage (though it has before, especially in CT, where it's more heavily enforced).
@Pscho: Yeah, Squeek does love all the formalities of written English. =)
Oh...but what if they have bad english...if their from a different country or something.
I don't find that very fair, no offense.
We take every situation into account. We're not going to ban some guy just for not speaking English as his first language.
Not helping your argument is the fact that several people from countries where English is NOT the primary language get along just fine on our forums. There's a significant difference between making occasional errors because you learned another language first, and just typing like a moron because properly typing out words is some how horribly time-consuming and inconvenient. The latter is what we are trying to prevent.
Also, we don't just ban people because they rape English. As has been previously stated, people are warned for certain offenses, and if those people choose to ignore their warning, we ban them.
Comment