Hurricane Florence

[MixMasterLar]

Re: Hurricane Florence

Death toll is at 5 last I heard, storm is slowing down too I think

It's dropped to a cat1 which is sexy but that's still a shitton of rain to come

[aperson]

Re: Hurricane Florence

flash flood emergencies are going up near the pamlico sound area. the freshwater flooding event is going to pick up and get very serious throughout the next 48-72 hours

[ShAiOnEiX]

Re: Hurricane Florence

yea I guess we should just disregard terribly alarming warnings from the majority of climate scientists because people do their own research

Something tells me that the ones that have called me out have not actually watched the video in it's entirety. The actual funding that comes from studying climate change and to prove it relies on them entirely into finding and skewing the data to make it look like it's worse off than it really is. Watch the video cuck.

I can see it now eventually you guys are gonna start telling me that the Earth isn't flat haha gtfo my face...actually I'm just kidding about the last part sorry I almost gave you a chance to fire back at me with that comment.

[j-rodd123]

Re: Hurricane Florence

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

[aperson]

Re: Hurricane Florence

Something tells me that the ones that have called me out have not actually watched the video in it's entirety. The actual funding that comes from studying climate change and to prove it relies on them entirely into finding and skewing the data to make it look like it's worse off than it really is. Watch the video cuck.

we can talk about anthropogenically forced climate change once you can give a passable explanation of how the greenhouse effect works.

[j-rodd123]

keep being a “free thinker” tho bro

we can talk about anthropogenically forced climate change once you can give a passable explanation of how the greenhouse effect works.

The annoying thing is these kids watch a random YouTube video that supports their preconceived opinion and ignore facts from soooooo many sources. And as someone who has worked in academia, the funding thing skewing results is the fav comment of one of these wannabe intellectual sheep who don’t understand scientific research

Also using the word cuck lol cringe

[ShAiOnEiX]

Re: Hurricane Florence

we can talk about anthropogenically forced climate change once you can give a passable explanation of how the greenhouse effect works.

Can we talk about how the carbon levels were much much higher during the dinosaur age and that we would never reach those levels of greenhouse gases and at the rate our expenditure of these gases in our modern world industry would never realistically even reach those enormous safe levels of C02 in the atmosphere millions of years ago.

[aperson]

Re: Hurricane Florence

Can we talk about how the carbon levels were much much higher during the dinosaur age and that we would never reach those levels of greenhouse gases and at the rate our expenditure of these gases in our modern world industry would never realistically even reach those enormous safe levels of C02 in the atmosphere millions of years ago.

Sure maybe you can cite your sources on CO2 (and other GHG) levels during the Triassic-Cretaceous (or whatever the "dinosaur age" means to you, that's not really a relevant stratigraphic era) and maybe some other relevant geologic periods as well like the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum or the end-Permian.

Also it'd be nice to see some sources demonstrating that none of our concentration pathways could reach those numbers. Preferably you could use some sources from IPCC's AR5 since it is the largest consensus policymaking project that includes representative concentration pathways for GHG concentrations by the end of the 21st century. If you want to be exciting and use the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway models that will be used for IPCC's AR6 as well, those are pretty reputable!

[j-rodd123]

Re: Hurricane Florence

Sure maybe you can cite your sources on CO2 (and other GHG) levels during the Triassic-Cretaceous (or whatever the "dinosaur age" means to you, that's not really a relevant stratigraphic era) and maybe some other relevant geologic periods as well like the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum or the end-Permian.

Also it'd be nice to see some sources demonstrating that none of our concentration pathways could reach those numbers. Preferably you could use some sources from IPCC's AR5 since it is the largest consensus policymaking project that includes representative concentration pathways for GHG concentrations by the end of the 21st century. If you want to be exciting and use the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway models that will be used for IPCC's AR6 as well, those are pretty reputable!

Smh you clearly didn’t watch the YouTube video

[aperson]

Re: Hurricane Florence

Also it's CO2 not C02. Easy mistake to make when you have literally no idea what you're talking about.

[Celirra]

Re: Hurricane Florence

i think everyone involved in this feud is being silly

[aperson]

Re: Hurricane Florence

Smh you clearly didn’t watch the YouTube video

It's funny because about 99% of people in meteorology are on board with climatologists but about 1%, like the dead Weather channel founder, Joe Bastardi, or Ryan Maue aren't. In the latter case, they just endlessly shift the goalposts of the debate as the effects of the anthropocene become more clear.

Since Coleman retired from working on the Weather Channel, they have quite good coverage of climate-related impacts from meteorological phenomena. Go figure.

[ShAiOnEiX]

Re: Hurricane Florence

Sure maybe you can cite your sources on CO2 (and other GHG) levels during the Triassic-Cretaceous (or whatever the "dinosaur age" means to you, that's not really a relevant stratigraphic era) and maybe some other relevant geologic periods as well like the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum or the end-Permian.

Also it'd be nice to see some sources demonstrating that none of our concentration pathways could reach those numbers. Preferably you could use some sources from IPCC's AR5 since it is the largest consensus policymaking project that includes representative concentration pathways for GHG concentrations by the end of the 21st century. If you want to be exciting and use the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway models that will be used for IPCC's AR6 as well, those are pretty reputable!

Jurassic period Carbon levels were around 1900ppm if that narrows it down for you at our current state it's around 400ppm. I'm sure you can find the data since you seem to highly knowledgeable in this field. Many reputable scientists have claimed that high carbon levels are not a main contributor for climate change.

[aperson]

Re: Hurricane Florence

Cite your source that Jurassic carbon levels were 1900ppm and you still haven't explained how the greenhouse effect works.

[aperson]

Re: Hurricane Florence

ps you may have trouble finding a source that "carbon" levels were at 1900ppm because we don't measure "carbon" in ppm. We measure different greenhouse gases that contain carbon, Like CO2 (carbon dioxide) and CH4 (methane) in PPM, some other greenhouse gases, like H2O (water vapor) don't even contain carbon. Maybe you mean that Jurassic CO2 concentration was 1900ppm? Would love to see some sources on that one too!