Hurricane Florence

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MixMasterLar
    Beach Bum Extraordinaire
    FFR Simfile Author
    • Aug 2006
    • 5283

    #61
    Re: Hurricane Florence

    Death toll is at 5 last I heard, storm is slowing down too I think

    It's dropped to a cat1 which is sexy but that's still a shitton of rain to come

    Comment

    • aperson
      FFR Hall of Fame
      FFR Simfile Author
      • Jul 2003
      • 3431

      #62
      Re: Hurricane Florence

      flash flood emergencies are going up near the pamlico sound area. the freshwater flooding event is going to pick up and get very serious throughout the next 48-72 hours

      Comment

      • ShAiOnEiX
        Banned
        • Jun 2015
        • 62

        #63
        Re: Hurricane Florence

        Originally posted by j-rodd123
        yea I guess we should just disregard terribly alarming warnings from the majority of climate scientists because people do their own research

        Something tells me that the ones that have called me out have not actually watched the video in it's entirety. The actual funding that comes from studying climate change and to prove it relies on them entirely into finding and skewing the data to make it look like it's worse off than it really is. Watch the video cuck.

        I can see it now eventually you guys are gonna start telling me that the Earth isn't flat haha gtfo my face...actually I'm just kidding about the last part sorry I almost gave you a chance to fire back at me with that comment.
        Last edited by ShAiOnEiX; 09-14-2018, 06:41 PM.

        Comment

        • j-rodd123
          End of the road
          • Oct 2006
          • 3692

          #64
          Re: Hurricane Florence

          It’s important to remember that scientists always focus on the evidence, not on opinions. Scientific evidence continues to show that human activities

          Originally posted by FictionJunction
          wow

          Comment

          • aperson
            FFR Hall of Fame
            FFR Simfile Author
            • Jul 2003
            • 3431

            #65
            Re: Hurricane Florence

            Originally posted by ShAiOnEiX
            Something tells me that the ones that have called me out have not actually watched the video in it's entirety. The actual funding that comes from studying climate change and to prove it relies on them entirely into finding and skewing the data to make it look like it's worse off than it really is. Watch the video cuck.
            we can talk about anthropogenically forced climate change once you can give a passable explanation of how the greenhouse effect works.

            Comment

            • j-rodd123
              End of the road
              • Oct 2006
              • 3692

              #66
              keep being a “free thinker” tho bro

              Originally posted by aperson
              we can talk about anthropogenically forced climate change once you can give a passable explanation of how the greenhouse effect works.
              The annoying thing is these kids watch a random YouTube video that supports their preconceived opinion and ignore facts from soooooo many sources. And as someone who has worked in academia, the funding thing skewing results is the fav comment of one of these wannabe intellectual sheep who don’t understand scientific research

              Also using the word cuck lol cringe
              Last edited by devonin; 09-14-2018, 07:02 PM.

              Originally posted by FictionJunction
              wow

              Comment

              • ShAiOnEiX
                Banned
                • Jun 2015
                • 62

                #67
                Re: Hurricane Florence

                Originally posted by aperson
                we can talk about anthropogenically forced climate change once you can give a passable explanation of how the greenhouse effect works.

                Can we talk about how the carbon levels were much much higher during the dinosaur age and that we would never reach those levels of greenhouse gases and at the rate our expenditure of these gases in our modern world industry would never realistically even reach those enormous safe levels of C02 in the atmosphere millions of years ago.
                Last edited by ShAiOnEiX; 09-14-2018, 06:51 PM.

                Comment

                • aperson
                  FFR Hall of Fame
                  FFR Simfile Author
                  • Jul 2003
                  • 3431

                  #68
                  Re: Hurricane Florence

                  Originally posted by ShAiOnEiX
                  Can we talk about how the carbon levels were much much higher during the dinosaur age and that we would never reach those levels of greenhouse gases and at the rate our expenditure of these gases in our modern world industry would never realistically even reach those enormous safe levels of C02 in the atmosphere millions of years ago.
                  Sure maybe you can cite your sources on CO2 (and other GHG) levels during the Triassic-Cretaceous (or whatever the "dinosaur age" means to you, that's not really a relevant stratigraphic era) and maybe some other relevant geologic periods as well like the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum or the end-Permian.

                  Also it'd be nice to see some sources demonstrating that none of our concentration pathways could reach those numbers. Preferably you could use some sources from IPCC's AR5 since it is the largest consensus policymaking project that includes representative concentration pathways for GHG concentrations by the end of the 21st century. If you want to be exciting and use the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway models that will be used for IPCC's AR6 as well, those are pretty reputable!

                  Comment

                  • j-rodd123
                    End of the road
                    • Oct 2006
                    • 3692

                    #69
                    Re: Hurricane Florence

                    Originally posted by aperson
                    Sure maybe you can cite your sources on CO2 (and other GHG) levels during the Triassic-Cretaceous (or whatever the "dinosaur age" means to you, that's not really a relevant stratigraphic era) and maybe some other relevant geologic periods as well like the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum or the end-Permian.

                    Also it'd be nice to see some sources demonstrating that none of our concentration pathways could reach those numbers. Preferably you could use some sources from IPCC's AR5 since it is the largest consensus policymaking project that includes representative concentration pathways for GHG concentrations by the end of the 21st century. If you want to be exciting and use the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway models that will be used for IPCC's AR6 as well, those are pretty reputable!
                    Smh you clearly didn’t watch the YouTube video

                    Originally posted by FictionJunction
                    wow

                    Comment

                    • aperson
                      FFR Hall of Fame
                      FFR Simfile Author
                      • Jul 2003
                      • 3431

                      #70
                      Re: Hurricane Florence

                      Also it's CO2 not C02. Easy mistake to make when you have literally no idea what you're talking about.

                      Comment

                      • Celirra
                        FFR Player
                        • Apr 2015
                        • 749

                        #71
                        Re: Hurricane Florence

                        i think everyone involved in this feud is being silly
                        ,,
                         ,_, -ー'"{
                         ゛ヌ ノノノノハヾ
                         ノ li.゚ ヮ゚ノi
                        彡と} 猫.{つ

                        Comment

                        • aperson
                          FFR Hall of Fame
                          FFR Simfile Author
                          • Jul 2003
                          • 3431

                          #72
                          Re: Hurricane Florence

                          Originally posted by j-rodd123
                          Smh you clearly didn’t watch the YouTube video
                          It's funny because about 99% of people in meteorology are on board with climatologists but about 1%, like the dead Weather channel founder, Joe Bastardi, or Ryan Maue aren't. In the latter case, they just endlessly shift the goalposts of the debate as the effects of the anthropocene become more clear.

                          Since Coleman retired from working on the Weather Channel, they have quite good coverage of climate-related impacts from meteorological phenomena. Go figure.

                          Comment

                          • ShAiOnEiX
                            Banned
                            • Jun 2015
                            • 62

                            #73
                            Re: Hurricane Florence

                            Originally posted by aperson
                            Sure maybe you can cite your sources on CO2 (and other GHG) levels during the Triassic-Cretaceous (or whatever the "dinosaur age" means to you, that's not really a relevant stratigraphic era) and maybe some other relevant geologic periods as well like the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum or the end-Permian.

                            Also it'd be nice to see some sources demonstrating that none of our concentration pathways could reach those numbers. Preferably you could use some sources from IPCC's AR5 since it is the largest consensus policymaking project that includes representative concentration pathways for GHG concentrations by the end of the 21st century. If you want to be exciting and use the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway models that will be used for IPCC's AR6 as well, those are pretty reputable!

                            Jurassic period Carbon levels were around 1900ppm if that narrows it down for you at our current state it's around 400ppm. I'm sure you can find the data since you seem to highly knowledgeable in this field. Many reputable scientists have claimed that high carbon levels are not a main contributor for climate change.
                            Last edited by ShAiOnEiX; 09-14-2018, 07:16 PM.

                            Comment

                            • aperson
                              FFR Hall of Fame
                              FFR Simfile Author
                              • Jul 2003
                              • 3431

                              #74
                              Re: Hurricane Florence

                              Cite your source that Jurassic carbon levels were 1900ppm and you still haven't explained how the greenhouse effect works.

                              Comment

                              • aperson
                                FFR Hall of Fame
                                FFR Simfile Author
                                • Jul 2003
                                • 3431

                                #75
                                Re: Hurricane Florence

                                ps you may have trouble finding a source that "carbon" levels were at 1900ppm because we don't measure "carbon" in ppm. We measure different greenhouse gases that contain carbon, Like CO2 (carbon dioxide) and CH4 (methane) in PPM, some other greenhouse gases, like H2O (water vapor) don't even contain carbon. Maybe you mean that Jurassic CO2 concentration was 1900ppm? Would love to see some sources on that one too!

                                Comment

                                Working...