mfw arizona

[choof]

http://www.azcentral.com/news/politics/articles/20140226arizona-jan-brewer-1062-statement.html

"“After weighing all of the arguments, I have vetoed Senate Bill 1062 moments ago,” Brewer told the media at a brief 5:45 p.m. news conference. “To the supporters of this legislation, I want you to know that I understand that long-held norms about marriage and family are being challenged as never before. Our society is undergoing many dramatic changes. However, I sincerely believe that Senate Bill 1062 has the potential to create more problems than it purports to solve.”"

and not only was this bill a thing, but actual human beings are outraged that it got vetoed.
thoughts?

[Solomine Gray]

Re: mfw arizona

My first thoughts when I saw the thread title were about how good an Arizona tea sounds right now.

[MrGiggles]

Re: mfw arizona

damn RINOs, man.

Real republicans wouldn't have caved to pressure from the elitist homosexual agenda.

I'm one of the few "real mans" remaining in America and will do all I can to seize this plague.

[Izzy]

Re: mfw arizona

Sure wish the article said what the bill was about.

[pokelda]

Re: mfw arizona

hey there rss feed

[rushyrulz]

Re: mfw arizona

I'd just like to point out how remarkable of a word "vetoed" is

[KrazyKitsune]

Re: mfw arizona

Sure wish the article said what the bill was about.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arizona_SB_1062

[adlp]

Re: mfw arizona

i could care less about this bill but ultimately believe that private businesses should reserve the right to refuse service to anyone. the thing is that if they do it they will lose business and ultimately go under so it's all on themselves

[Izzy]

Re: mfw arizona

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arizona_SB_1062

Religious exemption from any laws... The fuck. It is stupid enough that they get tax exemptions.

[Arntonach]

Re: mfw arizona

Yeah Arizona is pretty backwards. Not only did they decide to bring this up right when it was announced that a super bowl would be held in Phoenix, but the bill question is completely redundant since business can decide to not serve anyone regardless anyways.

[Razor]

Re: mfw arizona

My first thoughts when I saw the thread title were about how good an Arizona tea sounds right now.

same here

[devonin]

Re: mfw arizona

Yeah Arizona is pretty backwards. Not only did they decide to bring this up right when it was announced that a super bowl would be held in Phoenix, but the bill question is completely redundant since business can decide to not serve anyone regardless anyways.

Any individual or legal entity.

Ambulance driver, Doctor, Cop?

This was a hell of a lot farther reaching than just restaurants who, while they can refuse service to anybody, would otherwise have had to at least manufacture another reason why not besides "I don't like them there queer ******s"

[adlp]

Re: mfw arizona

yeah if that bill covered those professions that would be beyond overkill

[devonin]

Re: mfw arizona

The language says "Any individual or legal entity"

[XelNya]

Re: mfw arizona

The fact this was even attempted is pretty laughable.