Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

[Snowcrafta]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

Just make him an admin. He has TGB watching him and keeping him in check,but we really need a forum admin who is on our page as the old guy's community

[dAnceguy117]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

this post brought to you by Xx{TaKinG_tHe_IntErnET_seRioUSLy}xX

you probably should take a website seriously when you run said website

[korny]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

Can I give him a -1? Seriously, making a topic like this isn't how to become an admin. In the old days, and on most sites, campaigning for oneself pretty often made it so that they wouldn't make you a staff member. If you really want to be one, I think PMing them is a more effective way of doing it than making a topic like this one. Also a lot of what you plan to do really is things that could just be PM'd to the staff and they could choose to do them or not. Most of it isn't anything that you'd specifically have to do. Considering the obvious drawbacks of just making someone that requests it an admin, I think that would be an overall better solution.

[Izzy]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

What happened to the last thread?

[Doug31]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

Lol do people really think who should be made an admin shouldn't be a serious thing? You must not've made you own forums before. If you did and put a ton of hard work into them, and valued what you had done, you'd be sure to be very careful who you made an admin. They can easily and very significantly mess the whole thing up. This site probably has some backups in order to help prevent that, but I wouldn't know for sure. But I'm sure an admin could still mess it up in some ways if he/she wanted to.

[Razor]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

You must not've made you own forums before. If you did and put a ton of hard work into them, and valued what you had done, you'd be sure to be very careful who you made an admin.

I made the RF forums can I be admin

[hi19hi19]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

I made a forum once for a web design class can I be an admin too




please

see i even said the magic word

[Herogashix]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

Lol do people really think who should be made an admin shouldn't be a serious thing? You must not've made you own forums before. If you did and put a ton of hard work into them, and valued what you had done, you'd be sure to be very careful who you made an admin. They can easily and very significantly mess the whole thing up. This site probably has some backups in order to help prevent that, but I wouldn't know for sure. But I'm sure an admin could still mess it up in some ways if he/she wanted to.

Not sure if serious or.

[Snowcrafta]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

I created ODI. Arch would be a good admin.

[cedolad]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

I made Stepmania Groove, we would all be great admins.

[arcnmx]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

I have to agree with devonin, it doesn't really seem like admin is necessary here. Rearranging the forums or revamping user titles is something that would need to first go through discussions including the current staff anyway - so why not just make a suggestion thread about the topics? The rest sounds like you want a global moderator position.
... not that my opinion really matters, I've thus far refrained from managing the community/forums because I feel like I'd be overstepping certain boundaries.

Arch if you rework the homepage, make it more user friendly and add R^3 onto the homepage where players can conveniently get to it, I'd vote for you in a heartbeat.


Since... no other admins are doing it... probably ever...

Things will indeed change. R^3 is still in beta though, some stuff needs to happen before it becomes the official engine.

This is what I'm talking about, I feel a little left in the dark at times about certain aspects of the site. While we're entertained with events and tournaments and the such, the only time we hear about development is when it's released the public. Though we do have a bit in the say of certain parts of the site, I feel that keeping an open development blog or the such will help keep us out of the "in the dark" feeling.

Hang out in the R^3 thread then, the whole point of it was to make the engine development public and more open to instant player feedback as it's created

[cedolad]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

Hang out in the R^3 thread then, the whole point of it was to make the engine development public and more open to instant player feedback as it's created

I totally forgot that thread even existed, I don't see it on the homepage sidebar often, so I often neglect its existence

[Snowcrafta]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

I made Stepmania Groove, we would all be great admins.

This is his story

[Snowcrafta]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

Why don't we just collect all the major admins of the off spin sights that made an impression and make them admins?

Or how about we just let arch speak for all the admins.

[Snowcrafta]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

I have to agree with devonin, it doesn't really seem like admin is necessary here. Rearranging the forums or revamping user titles is something that would need to first go through discussions including the current staff anyway - so why not just make a suggestion thread about the topics? The rest sounds like you want a global moderator position.
... not that my opinion really matters, I've thus far refrained from managing the community/forums because I feel like I'd be overstepping certain boundaries.


Things will indeed change. R^3 is still in beta though, some stuff needs to happen before it becomes the official engine.


Hang out in the R^3 thread then, the whole point of it was to make the engine development public and more open to instant player feedback as it's created

Simple: the forum staff is lazy as fuck, the Arch wants to tackle all these issues

Arch0wl 2013