Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

[Arch0wl]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

I don't understand why you make a public thread here, instead of sending a PM to admins with your request.

If I am an admin, I have powers over normal users. Therefore the approval/endorsement of regular users matters just as much.

Let me put it this way: as a user of this site, would you prefer all staff decisions were made in private without your input?

[cedolad]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

If I am an admin, I have powers over normal users. Therefore the approval/endorsement of regular users matters just as much.

Let me put it this way: as a user of this site, would you prefer all staff decisions were made in private without your input?

This is what I'm talking about, I feel a little left in the dark at times about certain aspects of the site. While we're entertained with events and tournaments and the such, the only time we hear about development is when it's released the public. Though we do have a bit in the say of certain parts of the site, I feel that keeping an open development blog or the such will help keep us out of the "in the dark" feeling.

[Snowcrafta]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

You want to propose this bill through congress, have it pass in the senate, and ratified by the Presidents

[top]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

cedolad idk where you're coming from but who told you this wasn't a dictatorship?

[EtienneSM]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

Why not?

+1 to 20 day trial.

[dAnceguy117]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

+1, and +2 if you use the avatar you had when you were admin the first time

[Herogashix]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

Can't every single one of those tasks be done by just sending a forum PM to an existing forum admin with your suggestions for how you'd change them?

Do you honestly believe that works? I've already done that multiple times and nothing changes, nor do I get a response.

Arch0wl for admin, cause he seems like he's a cool guy and would get the job done. /seems/

[korny]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

Administrative oligarchy. How do we overcome the oppressors??

[lumphoboextreme]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

Not sure this thread will get anywhere, but I'll give my +1 as well.

[Doug31]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

Can I give him a -1? Seriously, making a topic like this isn't how to become an admin. In the old days, and on most sites, campaigning for oneself pretty often made it so that they wouldn't make you a staff member. If you really want to be one, I think PMing them is a more effective way of doing it than making a topic like this one. Also a lot of what you plan to do really is things that could just be PM'd to the staff and they could choose to do them or not. Most of it isn't anything that you'd specifically have to do. Considering the obvious drawbacks of just making someone that requests it an admin, I think that would be an overall better solution.

[adlp]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

yo doug i remember fishing your myspace account with blazze when i was about 15 and posted a coming out post on your bulletin haha good times remember that

[adlp]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

free a0

[justin_ator]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

free a0

[Choofers]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

Can I give him a -1? Seriously, making a topic like this isn't how to become an admin. In the old days, and on most sites, campaigning for oneself pretty often made it so that they wouldn't make you a staff member. If you really want to be one, I think PMing them is a more effective way of doing it than making a topic like this one. Also a lot of what you plan to do really is things that could just be PM'd to the staff and they could choose to do them or not. Most of it isn't anything that you'd specifically have to do. Considering the obvious drawbacks of just making someone that requests it an admin, I think that would be an overall better solution.

this post brought to you by Xx{TaKinG_tHe_IntErnET_seRioUSLy}xX

[Netjet!]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

I'd support arch getting back into the admin groove, if only for a little while

+1