Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cedolad
    moonchild~
    FFR Simfile Author
    • Jan 2007
    • 6879

    #16
    Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

    if you guys wanted a new homepage you could've asked. Not sure what shape the code is in, but I'm sure there a few individuals here on the forums that could do it.

    I am one of them.

    but oh yeah, +1 for arch's 20 day trial (and then some)

    Comment

    • Xiz
      TWG Chaos
      FFR Simfile Author
      • Feb 2012
      • 3399

      #17
      Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

      Originally posted by cedolad
      if you guys wanted a new homepage you could've asked. Not sure what shape the code is in, but I'm sure there a few individuals here on the forums that could do it.

      I am one of them.
      I'm cool with anyone doing it, as long as it gets done. I'm sorry for kinda being a dick about this but I mean, it kinda needs to get done :P

      Comment

      • cedolad
        moonchild~
        FFR Simfile Author
        • Jan 2007
        • 6879

        #18
        Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

        I agree, it does need to be done. But that's up to administration if they either want to do it, or give someone the permission to do so.

        But that's a different topic of discussion and I don't wanna shit on Arch's thread...again.

        Comment

        • yo man im awesome
          soleil ardent
          FFR Simfile Author
          • May 2007
          • 6514

          #19
          Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

          We need more Arch0wl in our FFR lives.









































          +1

          Originally posted by choof
          you double dad loving dipshit
          Originally posted by t-rogdor
          dammit now i have to smoke a picture of choof out of a bong
          Originally posted by smartdude1212
          I can't be the only guy who has wondered what it'd be like to menstruate all over the shower.

          Comment

          • Xiz
            TWG Chaos
            FFR Simfile Author
            • Feb 2012
            • 3399

            #20
            Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

            Yeah I'll hop on. I kinda wanna see where this goes.

            Change is Good

            +1

            Comment

            • cedolad
              moonchild~
              FFR Simfile Author
              • Jan 2007
              • 6879

              #21
              Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

              With the inclusion of more forums, how do you feel about promoting more users to becoming Local Moderators of newly made forums? Also do you find a need to include more local moderators in the current subforums we have?

              Also with your reorganization of the stickies, are you planning on either updating some of the dated context, or would you rather make a newer thread?

              Do you think 20 days is enough time to get through your agenda? Seems like you have a lot on your plate and I just wanted to know what priorities you have for the 20 days.

              Comment

              • thesunfan
                Role Tide
                Sectional Moderator
                • May 2011
                • 10859

                #22
                Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

                with the list of 100 to 1000 things, are you positive you could get it done in 20 days. I'm really surprised this is being taken seriously this time lol.
                Originally posted by Vendetta21
                Did you get a chance to kill that deadbeat sonuvabitch boyfriend of danceguys', "sunfan"? i hate that fucker. he's a stupid head. i'm way smarter and funnier and prettier and richer and more sensitive than him, and like i can get drunk and still hold complex logical conversations n shit and i bet that fucker cant.
                Originally posted by XelNya
                I'd suck a dick in a dark, dark alley.
                Originally posted by star-crossed
                (Someone helpfully lectured us in postgame that we voted out the wrong inactive player with COVID on Day 1.)

                Comment

                • PaperclipGames
                  Mrow~
                  • May 2008
                  • 648

                  #23
                  Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

                  I don't understand why you make a public thread here, instead of sending a PM to admins with your request.

                  That being said, I don't care too much about this place's administration, so as long as you don't fuck up everything (which I doubt you would), I don't really care whether you be an admin or not.
                  948 AAAs | 1461 FCs | 549 TPs | 7 FMO AAAs
                  Best AAAs: Exciting Hyper Highspeed Star (69), Nous (69), Pure Ruby (68), Heavenly Spores (68), Ambient Angels (66), Within Life (66), Defection (66) Southern Cross (65)

                  Comment

                  • rushyrulz
                    Digital Dancing!
                    FFR Simfile Author
                    FFR Music Producer
                    • Feb 2006
                    • 12985

                    #24
                    Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

                    Originally posted by PaperclipGames
                    I don't understand why you make a public thread here, instead of sending a PM to admins with your request.
                    Because he's campaigning and is trying to plead his case to the public who has nothing to do with it for some reason.


                    Comment

                    • MixMasterLar
                      Beach Bum Extraordinaire
                      FFR Simfile Author
                      • Aug 2006
                      • 5306

                      #25
                      Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

                      I'll give my support for Arch's 20 days of clean-up---but I will disagree that TGB needs to be bumped up/Chit Chat bumped down. Frankly, the order in which the sections are displayed feels right for new-timers.

                      Some of these sections do need merging, though. I like the overall plan and I'll support.

                      Comment

                      • Snowcrafta
                        V's beta-male entourage
                        • May 2005
                        • 2873

                        #26
                        Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

                        TGB is perfect exactly where it's at

                        Comment

                        • Rebirth0
                          FFR Originalbro
                          FFR Simfile Author
                          • Jun 2003
                          • 8751

                          #27
                          Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

                          Don't get your hopes up, Arch. The staff is a bit different than when I tried to be an admin in 2008, but FFR has something against making people admins. I was doing plenty of tedious things with the game all the time and couldn't even get access to implement anything

                          Comment

                          • Izzy
                            Snek
                            FFR Simfile Author
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 9195

                            #28
                            Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

                            Well back then it was about cliques and not productivity. It's a little better now at least for admins. Moderators not so much.

                            Also I don't think he is being serious.

                            Comment

                            • SCWolf
                              ༼ ͡◉ل͜ ͡◉༽ 👌
                              • Jun 2006
                              • 1662

                              #29
                              Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

                              Arch definitely has my vote. If he did it when he was 16, he's more than capable of doing when he's 25.

                              Comment

                              • justin_ator
                                🥓<strong><span style="col
                                • Mar 2007
                                • 7648

                                #30
                                Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

                                Originally posted by Xiz
                                Arch if you rework the homepage, make it more user friendly and add R^3 onto the homepage where players can conveniently get to it, I'd vote for you in a heartbeat.


                                Since... no other admins are doing it... probably ever...
                                Originally posted by DossarLX ODI
                                This just requires some css and/or HTML knowledge, it's not that hard to implement but the only admins on this site that I see active are bmah and arcnmx
                                Originally posted by cedolad
                                if you guys wanted a new homepage you could've asked. Not sure what shape the code is in, but I'm sure there a few individuals here on the forums that could do it.

                                I am one of them.

                                but oh yeah, +1 for arch's 20 day trial (and then some)
                                Originally posted by cedolad
                                I agree, it does need to be done. But that's up to administration if they either want to do it, or give someone the permission to do so.

                                But that's a different topic of discussion and I don't wanna shit on Arch's thread...again.
                                Not on thread topic, but I figured I would sort of address this..
                                Velocity is re-coding the site itself, so just be patient on it.
                                Last edited by justin_ator; 10-16-2013, 05:03 PM.

                                Comment

                                Working...