Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

[cedolad]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

if you guys wanted a new homepage you could've asked. Not sure what shape the code is in, but I'm sure there a few individuals here on the forums that could do it.

I am one of them.

but oh yeah, +1 for arch's 20 day trial (and then some)

[Xiz]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

if you guys wanted a new homepage you could've asked. Not sure what shape the code is in, but I'm sure there a few individuals here on the forums that could do it.

I am one of them.

I'm cool with anyone doing it, as long as it gets done. I'm sorry for kinda being a dick about this but I mean, it kinda needs to get done :P

[cedolad]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

I agree, it does need to be done. But that's up to administration if they either want to do it, or give someone the permission to do so.

But that's a different topic of discussion and I don't wanna shit on Arch's thread...again.

[yo man im awesome]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

We need more Arch0wl in our FFR lives.









































+1

[Xiz]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

Yeah I'll hop on. I kinda wanna see where this goes.

Change is Good

+1

[cedolad]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

With the inclusion of more forums, how do you feel about promoting more users to becoming Local Moderators of newly made forums? Also do you find a need to include more local moderators in the current subforums we have?

Also with your reorganization of the stickies, are you planning on either updating some of the dated context, or would you rather make a newer thread?

Do you think 20 days is enough time to get through your agenda? Seems like you have a lot on your plate and I just wanted to know what priorities you have for the 20 days.

[thesunfan]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

with the list of 100 to 1000 things, are you positive you could get it done in 20 days. I'm really surprised this is being taken seriously this time lol.

[PaperclipGames]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

I don't understand why you make a public thread here, instead of sending a PM to admins with your request.

That being said, I don't care too much about this place's administration, so as long as you don't fuck up everything (which I doubt you would), I don't really care whether you be an admin or not.

[rushyrulz]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

I don't understand why you make a public thread here, instead of sending a PM to admins with your request.

Because he's campaigning and is trying to plead his case to the public who has nothing to do with it for some reason.

[MixMasterLar]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

I'll give my support for Arch's 20 days of clean-up---but I will disagree that TGB needs to be bumped up/Chit Chat bumped down. Frankly, the order in which the sections are displayed feels right for new-timers.

Some of these sections do need merging, though. I like the overall plan and I'll support.

[Snowcrafta]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

TGB is perfect exactly where it's at

[Rebirth0]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

Don't get your hopes up, Arch. The staff is a bit different than when I tried to be an admin in 2008, but FFR has something against making people admins. I was doing plenty of tedious things with the game all the time and couldn't even get access to implement anything

[Izzy]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

Well back then it was about cliques and not productivity. It's a little better now at least for admins. Moderators not so much.

Also I don't think he is being serious.

[SCWolf]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

Arch definitely has my vote. If he did it when he was 16, he's more than capable of doing when he's 25.

[justin_ator]

Re: Arch0wl for re-admin 2013 (serious)

Arch if you rework the homepage, make it more user friendly and add R^3 onto the homepage where players can conveniently get to it, I'd vote for you in a heartbeat.


Since... no other admins are doing it... probably ever...

This just requires some css and/or HTML knowledge, it's not that hard to implement but the only admins on this site that I see active are bmah and arcnmx

if you guys wanted a new homepage you could've asked. Not sure what shape the code is in, but I'm sure there a few individuals here on the forums that could do it.

I am one of them.

but oh yeah, +1 for arch's 20 day trial (and then some)

I agree, it does need to be done. But that's up to administration if they either want to do it, or give someone the permission to do so.

But that's a different topic of discussion and I don't wanna shit on Arch's thread...again.

Not on thread topic, but I figured I would sort of address this..
Velocity is re-coding the site itself, so just be patient on it.