Re: Atheism/Theism thread
I'd argue that this is totally wrong -- if atheists tend to get snippy, it's because they get fed up trying to argue with people who aren't interested in argument, or who argue that facts are just opinions and ignorance is as good as knowledge. It's not.
Lots of good points were offered to you earlier and you disregarded them completely. That's going to upset people who are interested in having an honest debate.
This couldn't be further from the truth, and if anything, there are plenty of cases of religion leading to extraordinarily levels of selfish justification and oppression of others (not to mention hypocrisy). Being an atheist doesn't prevent one from putting others before themselves because, again, we don't get our morals from any "God" but through purely secular means (as does everyone else in the end, whether they realize it or not).
I'd argue that if you're acting moral to others only because of your religion (as opposed to something intrinsic to simply getting along as fellow humans), that's a notch below ideal par.
They don't believe in God because there is no evidence for God, and the things you think God is needed to explain can actually be explained through better means. God is a logical construct we understand very well, and it poses some serious problems when it comes to the truth value of things. Again, read the link I posted earlier about the dragon.
This argument is silly and I'm not even going to bother addressing it because I don't care enough -- but you say we're all created as equals in God's image. Does this imply you don't accept evolution or that Earth was formed via accretion?
I'd argue that this is totally wrong -- if atheists tend to get snippy, it's because they get fed up trying to argue with people who aren't interested in argument, or who argue that facts are just opinions and ignorance is as good as knowledge. It's not.
Lots of good points were offered to you earlier and you disregarded them completely. That's going to upset people who are interested in having an honest debate.
This couldn't be further from the truth, and if anything, there are plenty of cases of religion leading to extraordinarily levels of selfish justification and oppression of others (not to mention hypocrisy). Being an atheist doesn't prevent one from putting others before themselves because, again, we don't get our morals from any "God" but through purely secular means (as does everyone else in the end, whether they realize it or not).
I'd argue that if you're acting moral to others only because of your religion (as opposed to something intrinsic to simply getting along as fellow humans), that's a notch below ideal par.
They don't believe in God because there is no evidence for God, and the things you think God is needed to explain can actually be explained through better means. God is a logical construct we understand very well, and it poses some serious problems when it comes to the truth value of things. Again, read the link I posted earlier about the dragon.
This argument is silly and I'm not even going to bother addressing it because I don't care enough -- but you say we're all created as equals in God's image. Does this imply you don't accept evolution or that Earth was formed via accretion?









Comment