Counter-Strike 1.6 Thread

[FFRGreen]

Re: Counter-Strike 1.6 Thread

Ha you are the lowest rank i have ever seen its easy to get a good kdr in noob servers. Try facing the mexicans in pro servers. Besides, i actually know the programming behind the game. It aint shit. This shit is real.

I laughed.

[Thatskier]

Re: Counter-Strike 1.6 Thread

I'm rather impressed.

[Brycexx]

Re: Counter-Strike 1.6 Thread

the game is and always will be shit. combat arms that is not cs

[FFRGreen]

Re: Counter-Strike 1.6 Thread

I really don't get why you are talking about combat arms here. If you want to talk about it make your own thread.

[LJRoX]

Re: Counter-Strike 1.6 Thread

Lol i played before cs was released for combat arms
if I play now I'd probably pubstar 30-5 most games.

[LJRoX]

Re: Counter-Strike 1.6 Thread

If u think you're so good in CA, come play me on a 10man
you'll get like 1-9 at least. Rofl
and you'll get fucced by kommi's awp, also superfreak's m4/ak

[Superfreak04]

Re: Counter-Strike 1.6 Thread

I went 81-8 in my clans pub last week. XD
32 kills before my first death.

[PriestREA]

Re: Counter-Strike 1.6 Thread

Ha you are the lowest rank i have ever seen its easy to get a good kdr in noob servers. Try facing the mexicans in pro servers. Besides, i actually know the programming behind the game. It aint shit. This shit is real.

Defending combat arms, hahah.
Superfreak and LJRoX, we should play this kid and wreck him in CS. Come play us. I suck at 1.6, but I'm willing to play you with a bunch of others. If you don't have 1.6 get it. Or you can 1v1 me in Source and see the definition of pro gamers.

[Superfreak04]

Re: Counter-Strike 1.6 Thread

I wouldn't mind some friendly competition.
And here's my proof of my 81-8 score.

[PriestREA]

Re: Counter-Strike 1.6 Thread

I wouldn't mind some friendly competition.
And here's my proof of my 81-8 score.

Impressive.

Just a question, 1.6 isn't too CPU heavy is it? Because I could play on my crap laptop if it is less CPU heavy.

[Superfreak04]

Re: Counter-Strike 1.6 Thread

Impressive.

Just a question, 1.6 isn't too CPU heavy is it? Because I could play on my crap laptop if it is less CPU heavy.

Egh, it actually takes somewhat of a good PC to run CS 1.6 perfectly. My PC is about 5 or 6 years old and I still get less than 15 FPS in smoke grenades. So I couldn't really tell you.

[PriestREA]

Re: Counter-Strike 1.6 Thread

Egh, it actually takes somewhat of a good PC to run CS 1.6 perfectly. My PC is about 5 or 6 years old and I still get less than 15 FPS in smoke grenades. So I couldn't really tell you.

Okay, no problem. I'll try and run it on my old laptop. But when I do get my custom built back I'll play for sure.

I love it because it can run source at like 200 fps on regular servers, and locally it can run 250+ (high settings). I just love to boost fps because I can haha.

[Thatskier]

Re: Counter-Strike 1.6 Thread

Defending combat arms, hahah.
Superfreak and LJRoX, we should play this kid and wreck him in CS. Come play us. I suck at 1.6, but I'm willing to play you with a bunch of others. If you don't have 1.6 get it. Or you can 1v1 me in Source and see the definition of pro gamers.

When i get money ill buy the game. I really would buy it but to be honest the graphics look REALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLY bad.

[PriestREA]

Re: Counter-Strike 1.6 Thread

When i get money ill buy the game. I really would buy it but to be honest the graphics look REALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLY bad.

Yeah, it's quite an old game. Before I piss anyone off, I just give y'all a warning that I'm extremely competitive when it comes to games like counter-strike.

Counter-Strike source has better graphics, but LJRoX makes a good point about it being sluggish. It takes a higher-grade PC to run CS:S.

1.6 may be a little less CPU heavy considering that the textures are quite less defined and that the graphics are clearly less superior due to the timestamp between the two. In terms of versatility, Source is really good due to Garry's Mod.

1.6 is an extremely good game if you can find the appropriate server. A lot of them have been wrecked by stupid zombie mod games and Call of Duty Mods. A question to all: Does 1.6 still host a fair amount of regular servers for people who don't put up with the modding crap?

[Superfreak04]

Re: Counter-Strike 1.6 Thread

Yeah, it's quite an old game. Before I piss anyone off, I just give y'all a warning that I'm extremely competitive when it comes to games like counter-strike.

Counter-Strike source has better graphics, but LJRoX makes a good point about it being sluggish. It takes a higher-grade PC to run CS:S.

1.6 may be a little less CPU heavy considering that the textures are quite less defined and that the graphics are clearly less superior due to the timestamp between the two. In terms of versatility, Source is really good due to Garry's Mod.

1.6 is an extremely good game if you can find the appropriate server. A lot of them have been wrecked by stupid zombie mod games and Call of Duty Mods. A question to all: Does 1.6 still host a fair amount of regular servers for people who don't put up with the modding crap?

Regular servers are rather hard to find without modding. Some are out there, just hard to find. My clan server has NON-Steam people playing on it, and it's 16k. It's close to regular servers with no gay mods, so yeah.