TWG XLVI: For the King!

[FictionJunction]

Re: TWG XLVI: For the King!

well, that's nice. Pretty much everything flaw collected is now lost. At the very least, we have an approximately complete list of items, I guess =/

[talisman]

Re: TWG XLVI: For the King!

what the ****.

uh, let's redo what we did with flaw, but with me this time. That sounds like a revolver involved death, but the one revolver I know of I doubt was used, based on what I know about who has it.

[Yesssss]

Re: TWG XLVI: For the King!

So who should we redo it with?

[talisman]

Re: TWG XLVI: For the King!

"me this time"

[talisman]

Re: TWG XLVI: For the King!

psycho, do you or do you not have explosives?. and explain yourself for the discrepancy revealed earlier.

[FictionJunction]

Re: TWG XLVI: For the King!

so talisman, you know who had the revolver before it was passed or stolen?

[talisman]

Re: TWG XLVI: For the King!

let me clarify what I know about a revolver. I say "a" because I don't think we can establish that there's only one at this point.

flaw told me he had a revolver. He claimed to pass this revolver to a person. This person was to send flaw a lucky charm in return. why flaw just didn't demand the lucky charm in the first place I have no idea. Flaw did not receive the lucky charm. Flaw seered this person, and the result was green.

therefore

1) this person is a thief and killed flaw for some reason
2) an item was played on this person that made it impossible for them to send or receive stuff, or diverted stuff somewhere, and the revolver ended up in someone else's hands.

In any event, this person should not be lynched. Even in the event that they are a thief, this works to our detriment, as the other thief will then skip town tonight and we still will have 3 wolves left.

[talisman]

Re: TWG XLVI: For the King!

there's a third possibility too, perhaps more likely than the second, that the wolves played an item on flaw that affected the passage of his items, perhaps such that they in effect would gank anything flaw tried to pass.

[Kilgamayan]

Re: TWG XLVI: For the King!

Just to throw something else out there, I don't think it's out of the realm of possibility that one of the items affects seering results.

Then again I don't know what any of them do beyond what everyone knows.

[Yesssss]

Re: TWG XLVI: For the King!

In any event, this person should not be lynched. Even in the event that they are a thief, this works to our detriment, as the other thief will then skip town tonight and we still will have 3 wolves left.

Does it really matter if the other thief wins? Besides we don't know if that person is in fact a thief.

I've previously figured out that it is better to lynch a known thief than to not lynch a thief. Simply because the thieves cannot be trusted, seeing as killing the wolves is not their objective. It will also be nice to know that our items will not be tampered with as long as we don't pass them (or unless there is an item that can tamper). The wolves items will not be tampered with either, but seeming as there are more humans than wolves, it will be beneficial towards us.

Of course there's the problem of activity. The person who flaw gave the revolver to may have been sleeping/afk when he received the message and never saw it until it was too late (talisman confirm this if you can). If that person is indeed human, he should give up his items and maybe come out, or at least give a good reason why he didn't give flaw a lucky charm.

Just tell me your guys' thoughts on this.

[talisman]

Re: TWG XLVI: For the King!

it doesn't matter which thief wins, it does matter how many people are alive.

[talisman]

Re: TWG XLVI: For the King!

xero had a cursed shield last night which he passed to pnt.

who had the other, and who has it now? (if you want to tell me privately that's fine).

[talisman]

Re: TWG XLVI: For the King!

pntballa, you told me that you had collected info about items from a number of people, and that you were suspicious because everyone of them had some sort of color to go along with them in their name except for explosives.

however, none of the items listed have any colors in their names.

please explain this.

[pntballa18]

Re: TWG XLVI: For the King!

I didn't say they had a color. I said (or meant to say) that they all had a descriptor in front of them, like a color.

Besides the revolver(which I didn't know about) and explosives, this was true.

[talisman]

Re: TWG XLVI: For the King!

that's right, I misremembered.

psycho you still need to explain yourself.