Re: TWG 30 Postgame - HUMAN VICTORY!
Thoughts:
1) No one "nailed me" day 1 because my idea I thought was legitimately beneficial to the humans. After several hours of AIM discussion, it was realized that it was a bad idea, and went back on it. Hans lynched me for reasons he never really completely explained, and said that he voted for me after reading only pages 1 and 2 - not long enough to read my defense. That's not smart. I applaud the humans for getting me so quickly - but it was dumb luck, nothing more. If I were anyone else (and thus didn't know I was a wolf), I would have thought that killing me was a stupid idea.
In other words, you didn't "catch me in a lie" because I wasn't trying to lie. I was trying to appear as human as possible by putting forth a strategy that was good for the humans.
2) Fish and Guido should be ashamed of themselves for giving up. It's embarrassing.
3) I think the huge level of PMs from fake accounts kind of removes a lot of the fun from the game. It also removes the ballsiness of faking a role - when you fake a role, you've got to be prepared to take the fall if people don't buy it. Fake accounts let people fake roles without fear of penalty. I don't like it.
4) Iggy's behavior this whole game was reprehensible. He basically decided that he was going to make all the decisions for the humans and actually threatened anyone who disagreed with him with death. I'm not exaggerating.
Refuse to tell anyone what you're thinking and then threaten to kill people who show dissent?
Threaten the inactive with death?
Kill someone without even telling them, before they have a chance to make a defense?
This is not the way the alliance leader is supposed to act. Iggy acted like a tyrant.
You can't point to these actions as smart just because you happened to win by dumb luck - especially since the prosecutor and two of the wolves gave up and voted for themselves.
P.S. Afro, do you understand that voting for yourself neither helps your case nor makes people suspect that they might have lynched a human?
The game idea is good, but it was played so terribly.
Thoughts:
1) No one "nailed me" day 1 because my idea I thought was legitimately beneficial to the humans. After several hours of AIM discussion, it was realized that it was a bad idea, and went back on it. Hans lynched me for reasons he never really completely explained, and said that he voted for me after reading only pages 1 and 2 - not long enough to read my defense. That's not smart. I applaud the humans for getting me so quickly - but it was dumb luck, nothing more. If I were anyone else (and thus didn't know I was a wolf), I would have thought that killing me was a stupid idea.
In other words, you didn't "catch me in a lie" because I wasn't trying to lie. I was trying to appear as human as possible by putting forth a strategy that was good for the humans.
2) Fish and Guido should be ashamed of themselves for giving up. It's embarrassing.
3) I think the huge level of PMs from fake accounts kind of removes a lot of the fun from the game. It also removes the ballsiness of faking a role - when you fake a role, you've got to be prepared to take the fall if people don't buy it. Fake accounts let people fake roles without fear of penalty. I don't like it.
4) Iggy's behavior this whole game was reprehensible. He basically decided that he was going to make all the decisions for the humans and actually threatened anyone who disagreed with him with death. I'm not exaggerating.
Originally posted by Iggy
Originally posted by Iggy
Originally posted by Iggy
Originally posted by Afro
This is not the way the alliance leader is supposed to act. Iggy acted like a tyrant.
You can't point to these actions as smart just because you happened to win by dumb luck - especially since the prosecutor and two of the wolves gave up and voted for themselves.
P.S. Afro, do you understand that voting for yourself neither helps your case nor makes people suspect that they might have lynched a human?
The game idea is good, but it was played so terribly.





Comment