He read the setup and noticed that something changed almost immediately
i guess i must be a wolf. :/
Originally posted by roundbox
Game show could benefit the victim, so if we actually have to pick somebody, then I think someone who is relatively null across the board could be a good pick? Otherwise I think we should sleep on this game show
ok so i've had this thought.... what if we get punished for not playing the gameshow? Like what if tomorrow everything is bad and townies start dying if we dont play?
Originally posted by Hateandhatred
dafty 9
just in case u wong
Originally posted by Hakulyte
Dafty.Pixel 10
I don't think 9 is a good vote in a Xiz setup after overthinking about it.
you have no idea how much it frustrates me that i'm mid reading the thread and you guys just go and do this. If only you waited so i could put in some input :/ If we're doing chaos i atleast want a part in it
Originally posted by Hakulyte
Well, I have good news for you. Insta is 2 votes on the same number.
i dont know if this is true. but if it is Dafty.Pixel 10 Since we seem to be playing the game.
Originally posted by Xiz
"I think storn is town but he doesn't have a shirt on" - Roundbox
Originally posted by the sun fan
I have beat my meat to storn's posts no less than four times
order that the host receives actions doesn't matter at all, but you go backwards and go from there
you even got the VT being roleblocked lmao
If you "go backwards" then order matters.
What is so special about player A that their block on B happens before B's block can happen to C?
The host must, by definition, apply their actions in -an order- there is a priority system being used and you saying that my reasons were 'completely wrong' makes no sense. Like if the host got these instructions
From A -> I'm blocking B
From C -> I'm blocking D
Then the host just applies those actions, and B and D get blocked.
From A -> I'm blocking B
From B -> I'm blocking C
From C -> I'm doing some action at D
Your "work backwards" here implies that C does their action to D, but then B would block C, but then A would block B so does C's action fire?
There's basically race conditions here and you're saying that order doesn't matter except order has to matter, you just already pre-sorted everybody by labelling them "A" and "B" and "C"
I'm literally going back to sleep now and just needed to check on whether you said I got this right or wrong.
Comment