TWG CLXXIX: The Third FE Mystery Game Game Thread

[Adam33]

Re: TWG CLXXIX: The Third FE Mystery Game Game Thread

i already explained previously, where there's also the clear note that the final round will be a "sudden death tiebreaker" unique from the rng voting rounds to actually determine who the one winner of the event is.

we don't know whether or not talking about the event at this point will still be allowed because the round will be explained with a new ruleset at that time. In addition, i'm fairly sure a final round event like that would be much more balanced towards a smaller group of people, considering the 2 rounds previous to it to narrow down the voting pool, or else the event could have just been the sudden death round immediately instead of consisting of 2 extra rounds.

you say that RNG is vulnerable. Private communication is not allowed regarding the event. The only resource we have is public communication. In fact, we can probably get even more information knowing who got knocked out by voting what, given the "vulnerability", and future information that's inevitably going to come through the thread

1. If you are suggesting the "tiebreaker" is biased, I suggest you read the bastard mechanics portion of the OP
2. Yes, we do. Read the event please. "This event differs from all following events in that discussion of the event as it is ongoing is perfectly legal. There is, however, no strategic planning for the event in private chats."
3. I don't know if you've been in games like this before, but that is respected about 50% of the time. Usually someone will slip up and talk about strategy, and everyone will sheep them. I have already said this.
4. This is interesting, if you don't think about it too much. Here's the breakdown:
A villager gets eliminated, we have a tighter PoE of who might have gotten the prize if it goes to a wolf + unclaimed.
A wolf gets eliminated, it is the exact same either way.
So unless you think it is BETTER to have an infinitesimal chance at figuring out who won a prize and then didn't claim it than it is to have villagers in the rand, your suggestion is worse. Also, if you think that is better, you should voluntarily not vote and eliminate yourself from the event, because your strategy hinges on it being optimal for villagers to be eliminated from the event

[mellon_collie]

Re: TWG CLXXIX: The Third FE Mystery Game Game Thread

you guys should let me decide who to vote for

I will follow your vote for the lynch but I could never betray (one of my 2) waifus if you pick a different one

I will NOT vote for a waifu that's not cute

[Adam33]

Re: TWG CLXXIX: The Third FE Mystery Game Game Thread

I will follow your vote for the lynch but I could never betray (one of my 2) waifus if you pick a different one

I will NOT vote for a waifu that's not cute

This is another reason why unified voting is important...some people are all about "waifus"...but I don't want to make a point of it

[mellon_collie]

Re: TWG CLXXIX: The Third FE Mystery Game Game Thread

WHY IS ADAM REPLYING TO PEOPLE RUDELY AFTER THEY SAID STUPID RUDE SHIT TO HIM? BURN ADAM

nobody said anything rude to you tho

you were pretty rude in your responses

This has been raeko the polite police with the rudeness report

[mellon_collie]

Re: TWG CLXXIX: The Third FE Mystery Game Game Thread

This is another reason why unified voting is important...some people are all about "waifus"...but I don't want to make a point of it

it's a waifu popularity contest. that's the point

[Hakulyte]

Re: TWG CLXXIX: The Third FE Mystery Game Game Thread

rude

Wolf confirmed.

Rude theory.

[Charu]

Re: TWG CLXXIX: The Third FE Mystery Game Game Thread

Also, if you think that is better, you should voluntarily not vote and eliminate yourself from the event, because your strategy hinges on it being optimal for villagers to be eliminated from the event

Okay man, I've got your back, but even this is a bit too much.

Oof.

[Xiz]

Re: TWG CLXXIX: The Third FE Mystery Game Game Thread

This has been raeko the polite police with the rudeness report

Part of me wants to load up Cinema4d and quickly model a news intro for this

[LightManticorex2]

Re: TWG CLXXIX: The Third FE Mystery Game Game Thread

Really hoping we don’t have 30 pages by the time I get out of work.

[Charu]

Re: TWG CLXXIX: The Third FE Mystery Game Game Thread

Suggesting someone not to vote just to get eliminated is pretty

OOF

[mellon_collie]

Re: TWG CLXXIX: The Third FE Mystery Game Game Thread

Wolf confirmed.

Rude theory.

hello I am the POLITE POLICE. wee woo wee woo stop being rude to me calling me a wolf

[Daikyi]

Re: TWG CLXXIX: The Third FE Mystery Game Game Thread

1. If you are suggesting the "tiebreaker" is biased, I suggest you read the bastard mechanics portion of the OP
2. Yes, we do. Read the event please. "This event differs from all following events in that discussion of the event as it is ongoing is perfectly legal. There is, however, no strategic planning for the event in private chats."
3. I don't know if you've been in games like this before, but that is respected about 50% of the time. Usually someone will slip up and talk about strategy, and everyone will sheep them. I have already said this.
4. This is interesting, if you don't think about it too much. Here's the breakdown:
A villager gets eliminated, we have a tighter PoE of who might have gotten the prize if it goes to a wolf + unclaimed.
A wolf gets eliminated, it is the exact same either way.
So unless you think it is BETTER to have an infinitesimal chance at figuring out who won a prize and then didn't claim it than it is to have villagers in the rand, your suggestion is worse. Also, if you think that is better, you should voluntarily not vote and eliminate yourself from the event, because your strategy hinges on it being optimal for villagers to be eliminated from the event

1 - i think you misunderstood - assuming in the coordinated world, every player is in the tiebreaker round, because the rules are still hidden for that round, there is potential that having an elevated number in a private faction will benefit. however that's something that we don't know, and choosing coordination over rng is a crapshoot, so you can't say it's "no benefit"

2 - i'm talking about the tiebreaker, which like i apparantly need to elaborate more for you, will potentially have a completely different ruleset.

3 - what are you saying? i'm stating that as a fact i'm unsure why you needed to say this lmfao

4 - you're currently focusing on "who's gonna win??? who's gonna get prize?!!?!?" and once again, i think this is the mindset of scum currently. when there's literally 0 thought given to "maybe we can see interactions based on stacking on people who outed their vote in thread" and actual hunting scum, i think this speaks for itself, since the reasoning you're giving here is "wow you want wolves to win the event" which doesn't make sense lmfao

[Xiz]

Re: TWG CLXXIX: The Third FE Mystery Game Game Thread

Really hoping we don’t have 30 pages by the time I get out of work.

Let's get to 40

[Charu]

Re: TWG CLXXIX: The Third FE Mystery Game Game Thread

Really hoping we don’t have 30 pages by the time I get out of work.

To bad, bucko. This is a 24 player game!

[Celirra]

Re: TWG CLXXIX: The Third FE Mystery Game Game Thread

Wolf confirmed.

Rude theory.

Rude