Re: TWG XCIV: Old Blood
wolves are tps freakysnots and someone that hasnt posted yet called it
wolves are tps freakysnots and someone that hasnt posted yet called it
-
Originally posted by ~jroddOriginally posted by ~Tao of Dossar -
Re: TWG XCIV: Old Blood
freakysnots Because wolf.
Comment
-
Re: TWG XCIV: Old Blood
Yee-haw, four pages of posts!
Yet only like half of it is substantially useful, game-wise. Oh well. One has to work with what one has to work.
Okay, first things first: As Manti said, claiming roles in the thread is awfully easy and shouldn't be trusted instantly. It is up to every player to define by themselves if whoever claims is telling the truth. But be careful...please.
Second things second: Roles.
Seeing how there wasn't an Innocent Child, this could mean that there is a good chance there are Masons on the game. Yes, the probability of there being zero is bigger, but it doesn't hurt to make some sort of plan for the Masons, if any. Masons, be sure to be active between yourselves. You two/three have a great voting influence. So it is important for you Masons to pay attention.
Also, one shot roles. Be very, very careful when you use roles. Not too late, so you don't get killed and you don't use them, but also don't use them if you aren't sure of what you're doing. Wasting powers isn't something one can afford.
Aaaaaand...yes, looking at the C9 configuration, there is 50% of there being a Serial Killer. Just a general reminder.
Third things third: Lynching. Let's not rush. We have...what...today, tomorrow and Monday to lynch. I haven't seen a single serious vote around. Yes, I know they wouldn't hurt, I know only insta-lynches would work, but...eh, it is a pet peeve of mine, mainly because I'm used to see every single vote count.
There is no outside communication, so we rely on the thread. So, come on, post, people!
I think I covered everything that needed to be said...I'm not sure if I did.
Comment
-
Re: TWG XCIV: Old Blood
k. I just been able to get on since my internet crapped out on me...again... Anyhow, since we should go for a Day 1 insta, and seeing from the posts in this thread, and just by skimming through the posts, and from what I see as the most suspicious of everyone else so far (and I can't explain it properly due to me just waking up -_-...), I'm going to vote for V, this could change later but I'll go into full detail when I have more energy ~_~
Comment
-
Re: TWG XCIV: Old Blood
Ill read through everything when I get home from work today. Slept kinda late and just now remembered that this was going on. Ill read all the fantastical posts and what not later.Comment
-
Re: TWG XCIV: Old Blood
James May what has V done that's so suspicious? From where I'm standing, he's just promoted activity and discussion.
Eco FriendlyDear sirs,
One of my checks was returned marked "insufficient funds".
In view of current events in the banking market, does that refer to me or to you?
Sincerely,
Your Client
♥~ChuComment
-
Re: TWG XCIV: Old Blood
where is one winged angel, you view this thread mang.
no going utr this time!!
Originally posted by FictionJunctionComment
-
Re: TWG XCIV: Old Blood
Yeah, I’ve been reading the thread, just really don’t have anything constructive to add at this point. If we’re going to lynch someone Day 1, it’s probably just going to be a crapshoot as to whether or not we hit a wolf. Also, any wolf that’s approaching insta will probably just claim blue, but any blue would obviously do this as well, so I don’t really know how to deal with that issue. If a few humans think the player in question to be lynched is bullshitting about being blue, and they subsequently throw more votes onto him, if he’s flipped blue then what? Are the players that tossed on those additional votes after the claim wolfish? Because that’s probably going to happen almost every time we’re about to nail a wolf and the only way to actually take them out is for those two or three players to call them out on their shit and keep pushing (this matters less when approaching end-game, but first two, even three Day phases this is a big issue). Obviously it’s situational and there will be times where the players that pushed seem more wolfish than others, but eh, just something I’m concerned about for this game.
To comment on what Kraut said, I believe one-shot seers are the only one-shot powers that should be sent during N1, and only if they elect to do so. Can’t afford to waste a valuable vigi this early based on next to nothing, and roleblockers won’t have much to go off of in terms of blocking wolves/potential SK. Perhaps if a one-shot guard sees one of the more insightful and talkative players as likely to be human, they could guard N1...but roleblocks/vigis I would definitely advise against it.
Everything else I could say at this point seems like it would be common sense. Hell, everything I just typed was common sense. So yeah, I honestly don’t have anything else to contribute at this point. I suppose I’ll throw a vote on meno to get people talking.
Originally posted by ilikexdComment
-
Re: TWG XCIV: Old Blood
VOTECOUNT
zoshi (0): freakysnots
v (2): viccica, freakysnots, james
Manti (1): V, freakysnots
viccica (0): jrodd
syhto (1): TPS
jrodd (1): syhto
freaky (1): zoshi
james (1): viccica
OWA (1): jrodd
meno (1): OWA
5 votes from lynch
yet to vote: manti, Gun, meno, kraut
Comment
-
Re: TWG XCIV: Old Blood
wow what okay im gonna go for meno for now, yall talking about an insta but look at these votes lol
and freakysnots changing his vote like 4 times is just retarded but idk I might just spam votes just to confuse everyone because confusion is funnyOriginally posted by ~jroddOriginally posted by ~Tao of DossarComment
-
Re: TWG XCIV: Old Blood
maybe that was his idea all along ....
fight fire with fire mantiOriginally posted by ~jroddOriginally posted by ~Tao of DossarComment
-
Re: TWG XCIV: Old Blood
i mean freakyOriginally posted by ~jroddOriginally posted by ~Tao of DossarComment
-
Re: TWG XCIV: Old Blood
syhto
Comment
-
Re: TWG XCIV: Old Blood
actually you know what I just read the thread over again
this game has a lot of roles in it
and im gonna change my vote to owa
TO GET PEOPLE TALKING
you're just like idk but im gonna type a lot anyways well i still dk tho sorry ya well neither do I nice response though zzzzzz also I don't necessarily agree with you on your "common sense" due to the fact that it's hardly even followable (but who am I to talk)
plus you smell badOriginally posted by ~jroddOriginally posted by ~Tao of DossarComment
Comment