TWG XXIX - Player Signups - Monday 7pm & 11pm EST

[Kilgamayan]

Re: TWG XXIX - Player Signups - Monday 7pm & 11pm EST

Rephrasing the question doesn't change it when it means the same thing.

Perhaps there should be a rule against asking more than one question about roles.

[blahblah18]

Re: TWG XXIX - Player Signups - Monday 7pm & 11pm EST

you people are all so scared of anything new or intelligent, it really is starting to make me sick to my stomache

[Wilkin]

Re: TWG XXIX - Player Signups - Monday 7pm & 11pm EST

In reference to Kilga's post at top of the page:

Have some sort of risqué theme going for TWG XXX or something? Naughty you. Not that I know you that well. Or at all.

Meh.

[JurseyRider734]

Re: TWG XXIX - Player Signups - Monday 7pm & 11pm EST

In reference to Kilga's post at top of the page:

Have some sort of risqué theme going for TWG XXX or something? Naughty you. Not that I know you that well. Or at all.

Meh.

The only thing risqué about Kilga is his hentai collection.

and his beard.

[iggymatrixcounter]

Re: TWG XXIX - Player Signups - Monday 7pm & 11pm EST

Why don't you just make it so the int. can ask only 1 question that the person has to tell the truth. That way they could ask if they were red, blue, or whatever. This way you won't have the prblem of making three separate questions.

[Tps222]

Re: TWG XXIX - Player Signups - Monday 7pm & 11pm EST

Uh, I'm not getting iggy's post.

That's just asking for their roles. Re-read the description of the interrigator.

[nforcer06164]

Re: TWG XXIX - Host Signups.

nforcer because I don't want him running against me for TWG30 signups.

Oh, this is going to be fun, isn't it =P

[Kilgamayan]

Re: TWG XXIX - Player Signups - Monday 7pm & 11pm EST

The thing is, you've run so many times without winning and I've hosted a lot before so you're going to get a lot of pity votes and "new guy instead of old guy" votes. I don't want to have to compete with that. >_>

And no, the theme I have planned is not sex-oriented.

[nforcer06164]

Re: TWG XXIX - Player Signups - Monday 7pm & 11pm EST

The thing is, you've run so many times without winning and I've hosted a lot before so you're going to get a lot of pity votes and "new guy instead of old guy" votes. I don't want to have to compete with that. >_>

And no, the theme I have planned is not sex-oriented.

Well, then don't. I haven't hosted. This was the fourth time I've tried. And you've hosted 4+ times, I'm sure.

[Tasselfoot]

Re: TWG XXIX - Player Signups - Monday 7pm & 11pm EST

How about we wait for Fish/Mead to answer as to the type of questions for the Int.

Besides, the humans would probably WANT the stuff that I listed.

[FishFishRevolution]

Re: TWG XXIX - Player Signups - Monday 7pm & 11pm EST

Alright, the set of questions that Tass just asked would be considered illegal. The only way you are allowed to ask more than question that would draw you to the same conclusion is if you used multi-step deductive reasoning. Such as if you knew for example that mead was a wolf, you could ask the person how many times they had talked to mead this game, then you could ask what they talked about, then you could ask if they were a wolf.

Here is a standard set of questions for an interrogator to use:

"Are you a wolf?"
"Who is the master wolf?"
"How many wolves are left?"

All three questions deal with different subject matter, and a smart person can learn a lot from even false answers, based on how quickly or the manner of response.

As for a set rule for the interrogator: You may not ask the same question per person more than once, you may not rephrase the question to ask it again, and you may also not ask two questions dealing with specifically the same subject matter, per person.

Is there anything else that needs clarification?

ALSO FOR THE PURPOSE OF KEEPING THINGS SIMPLE, I'VE DECIDED THAT THE WOLVES WILL ALL KNOW EACH OTHER'S IDENTITIES. Sorry, Tass, no faking a wolf this game.

[HansSky]

Re: TWG XXIX - Player Signups - Monday 7pm & 11pm EST

Alright...I think we can claim mead/fish the winner. Player signups?

[iggymatrixcounter]

Re: TWG XXIX - Player Signups - Monday 7pm & 11pm EST

What about making your question(s) Yes or No questions? That way you have to ask the right question without saying something like "What role are you, and making them give out everything without you being able to reason on who they actually are.

[MilfeulleSakuraba]

Re: TWG XXIX - Player Signups - Monday 7pm & 11pm EST

Here is a standard set of questions for an interrogator to use:

"Are you a wolf?"
"Who is the master wolf?"
"How many wolves are left?"

All three questions deal with different subject matter, and a smart person can learn a lot from even false answers, based on how quickly or the manner of response.

I would assume that you would not tell the regular wolves who the Master Wolf is, then, because otherwise asking those three questions will guarantee a lynched wolf being forced to admit it.

EDIT: Actually, instead of asking "Who is the master wolf?", the interrogator could just ask "Is such-and-such a wolf?" where such-and-such is someone not present in the chat (and thus the question is different from the first one) and get the desired confession regardless.

[Afrobean]

Re: TWG XXIX - Player Signups - Monday 7pm & 11pm EST

Signups? In this thread?

Definitely should have its own thread.

Anyway, I'm kinda disappointed by the idea of the wolves knowing each other. It gives the humans way too much power through the interrogator (and you just know that he's going to come out day 1, so instant open alliance). The only thing I can see which would be kinda fair is to remove guardian (or angel in this case) so that the int can't come out right away day 1. It'd be more fair. With the interrogator being basically invincible AND being able to get LOTS of info, it's way too stacked for the humans. And especially now, it's better for the wolves to have an edge. With all these alliance based games, it's almost impossible for wolves to win.