TWC Suggestion

[blahblah18]

RE: TWC Suggestion

Thanks guys for realizing its not The Tass's Council, or The Totalitarian Council or whatever... btw sorry for my last 4 posts, I've been real cynical and bitter in them, and it really is just a game, and it realyl is just a forum... but I guess I have principles... oh well

[HansSky]

Re: RE: TWC Suggestion

If you look at this group, it is 5 people with 5 different views on the game. Chardish has the view mostly from running games, Blah has the view from playing only, Kilga has the most experience, I've got a ton of heart for the game and logic, and Guido brings a nice solid medium throughout his games.

Then why wouldn't you want all of the views to be heard?

[Tasselfoot]

RE: Re: RE: TWC Suggestion

Lets see.... Kilga can back me up on this (as Chardish/Guido aren't going to the forums for another month, and Blah hasn't gotten alot of my IMs):

We have a decusion to make, so I write up a paragraph describing the facts. Every time I've gotton 1-2 words back from Kilga. Usually "Thats fine" or "Sure". From Guido/Chardish I get a sentence or two, but generally speaking everything said is "Yes, I agree with your point of view Tass."

So, what is there to argue when all 3 of them agree with my point of view. The things that have been up for discussion, apart from Neon's joining, have been very straight forward. And, Neon has since been let in as we need players.

This is getting locked, because it is something the council needs to discuss amongst ourselves, not out in the open.