TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread

[thesunfan]

Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread

I wonder if Charu will ever fall from #1

Red Blaster shall rise to the #1 slot

it is predestined

Yoshl shall be tilted as hard as he possibly can be

[Charu]

Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread

The tilt-a-lings

[botchi246]

Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread

i got 9 points. yall scurred

[cedolad]

Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread

i got fuck pussy bitches money get thugged bye

[Charu]

Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread

Boop, bumping this for peeps to see

[Tokzic]

Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread

my row has an error or two, i think

2/4 games, 25% winrate

[thesunfan]

Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread

why does gold stinger have 10 points for 1 win?
edit: ya you forgot to tally the scumgame he won

[Xiz]

Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread

Updates:

my row has an error or two, i think
2/4 games, 25% winrate

Fixed, apparently I deleted two rows in Overall % column, creating the error.

edit: ya you forgot to tally the scumgame he won

Fixed. 10 points for how quickly wolves dominated. It's # of players in game - 2 points per day. Game ended night 2. 14-2-2=10

- Removed speed turboTWG game from points
- Fixed XelNya points
- Fixed Red Blaster Points
- Added Game 153



Now that we are halfway into the year about, how do you guys like/dislike the current formula? Should it be tweaked? Some questions I've been thinking about:


1) Adjusting current formula: (# of players) - (# of days x 2) = Points
2) Adjusting Win % for Finals Game from 50% to anywhere from 60%-40%
3) Host points currently = 2, should they be 3?
4) Modkill = -10, should it be more or based off of how bad the modkill was? (non-accident vs accident)

[Xiz]

Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread

So the current dilemma is that the current stats do not reflect those who have performed well this year. So instead, we are thinking of transitioning to a simple system where everyone ranks each player in the game.

So 13 players, each player places the other 12 on a ranking system from 1st to 12th. Thoughts?

[roundbox]

Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread

So the current dilemma is that the current stats do not reflect those who have performed well this year. So instead, we are thinking of transitioning to a simple system where everyone ranks each player in the game.

So 13 players, each player places the other 12 on a ranking system from 1st to 12th. Thoughts?

Top 5 or top 3 imo

The full list makes some hard decisions (like the players in the middle. How do you compare 8th vs 9th? I hear a ton of these debates when it comes to grading)

Selection should begin no earlier than 48 hours after official game end. Emotions often run high at the very end of the game, especially for the players still alive, and often times people will immediately run to post game and make a quick vote while still high on emotion. Voting should close within one week of opening.

Players should give some explanation for their votes too.

[thesunfan]

Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread

changing modkills to case to case is a good idea i think

I actually kind of like the system as it is, just not how points are < winrate.

If it was to be changed, I think having a top 5 might be made better by having like top 2 wolves and top 3 villagers or so

[Xiz]

Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread

What if I remove the 50% winrate requirement? And just base it off points?

[Xiz]

Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread

If modkills were changed to case by case, what do you think they should be?

[Red Blaster]

Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread

So the current dilemma is that the current stats do not reflect those who have performed well this year. So instead, we are thinking of transitioning to a simple system where everyone ranks each player in the game.

So 13 players, each player places the other 12 on a ranking system from 1st to 12th. Thoughts?

This will lead to bias as fuck results.

[thesunfan]

Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread

What if I remove the 50% winrate requirement? And just base it off points?

gud idea