TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread

[Gradiant]

Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread

And ''real'' twg games could easily have simpler mechanics. Are all the ''real'' twg games with these setups also going to be 1/2 counted?

[storn42]

Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread

i think jTWGs should be 1 point for losing and 3 for winning. it shows that playing a jTWG is still important, but also shows that its not as hardcore in a sense as normal TWG.
i Think a good host number is 2. on average it gives less points than playing a game (assuming 50% winrate) while still rewarding points for actually hosting.
a good way to reward players for playing well could be to give them an extra point if they were alive when the game ended. This also means that even if the team lost the game, you managing not to die can get rewarded,

[Xiz]

Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread

it was actually the opposite, like the quicker the town won the more points they got

More thinking out loud here, but then:

1 point per player, so 13 games = 13 points total. Goes down 2 point per day (till 3)

So..
13 player game, town wins d3 = 7 points
13 player game, town wins d4 = 5 points
13 player game, town wins d5 = 3 points

Then...
20 player game, town wins d6 = 10 points?

That way, the more people play, greater risk? I dunno.

i think jTWGs should be 1 point for losing and 3 for winning.

If my formula above isn't broken and stupid and it works, then jTWG might be a standard 3 win 1 loss, regardless of players?

[Xiz]

Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread

jtwg's should either count for ~1/2 of a normal game or be completely separate

junior games tend to be much simpler mechanically compared to "real" twg games regardless of how often veterans like to play in them

I agree with this completely. I never try ever when doing jtwg, and actually usually attempt to get caught by newbies :P

[Xiz]

Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread

Also, how about getting a +1 point for replacing IN?

[Red Blaster]

Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread

Second place woo

[Makilaz]

Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread

Also, how about getting a +1 point for replacing IN?

+1 point for replacing in, +2 points for hosting a game so there isn't a disincentive to host vs playing

[DaBackpack]

Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread

is there a list of which games comprise the tally?

[Xiz]

Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread

grtz on mod green blaster.

I'll add the +1 for replacement in.

And DBP what do you mean

[DaBackpack]

Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread

grtz on mod green blaster.

I'll add the +1 for replacement in.

And DBP what do you mean

like what games were used

[Red Blaster]

Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread

like what games were used

One would assume only games in 2016..?

[Xiz]

Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread

Ive started in 2016 till the end of 2016

[choof]

Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread

having my name on this implies that I'm worth keeping track of when this is definitely not the case

requesting that I get taken off this list

[choof]

Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread

this is still really cool tho and I'd love to see an all-star game

[Red Blaster]

Re: TWG 2016 Ranked Test Thread

having my name on this implies that I'm worth keeping track of when this is definitely not the case

requesting that I get taken off this list

Shaddap choobers
You're a better player than you give yourself credit for.