''LMB'' Pack (submissions closed)

[choof]

Re: ''To be named pack'' (submissions open)

If you have read carefully what i said, i told him ''based off of what i'm gonna chart''

then release a pack of your own shitty charts instead of asking people to artificially inflate your pack with shit that all feels the same

[choof]

Re: ''To be named pack'' (submissions open)

I chart what i want.
I accept what i want to accept.
I am the pack host and for what i chart and add to the pack, everything else must go with it in order for it to be consistent.
Hard files doesn't mean it's unplayable.

What will get accepted or not is entirely up to me.

well that's all fine and fucking dandy but you've given no reasons aside from "bad song choice lol too easy lol" so don't expect people to take you even remotely seriously

[choof]

Re: ''To be named pack'' (submissions open)

give us an example of what kinds of charts you want in this pack or fuck off

[ilikexd]

Re: ''To be named pack'' (submissions open)

I chart what i want.
I accept what i want to accept.
I am the pack host and for what i chart and add to the pack, everything else must go with it in order for it to be consistent.
Hard files doesn't mean it's unplayable.

What will get accepted or not is entirely up to me.

You should still give guidelines. Obviously all of that is true but it's unhelpful for anyone considering participating.

[MSB Khelly]

Re: ''To be named pack'' (submissions open)

give us an example of what kinds of charts you want in this pack or fuck off

I think he wants like this: http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/...d.php?t=145084

[Soul Evans]

Re: ''To be named pack'' (submissions open)

Alright i'll tell you what i want

Try your luck and send me a file it must be
A) D6+ or High D5.
B) A file that's good, what's good is that i'll be judging if i like it or not.
C) It can be any song choice you want aslong as i don't mind it.

Scintill's file was alright, but it wasn't what i was looking for as a chart, it was too simple as a chart and felt dull (no offense to scintill)

[AZVW_2]

Re: ''To be named pack'' (submissions open)

15 viewing this thread... WoW

[ilikexd]

Re: ''To be named pack'' (submissions open)

B) A file that's good, what's good is that i'll be judging if i like it or not.
C) It can be any song choice you want aslong as i don't mind it.

Try your luck

Neither of these are guidelines. It's just you arrogantly reiterating the fact that you are going to decide what you accept.

[Buta-san]

Re: ''To be named pack'' (submissions open)

hope im not too late for gfx

[Soul Evans]

Re: ''To be named pack'' (submissions open)

Oh wow you thanks for the GFX man!

Also ilikexd: It's a pack without any theme in mind, just files that are hard and i like them +don't mind the song so much is where everything else is allowed, to this day there are charts that i don't like the song but the file is still enjoyable for me, that's my main message for this.

[sunn0glasses]

Re: ''To be named pack'' (submissions open)

hyped for choof's 300 bpm JS file

[Charu]

Re: ''To be named pack'' (submissions open)

Do I sense some dank drama in here?

[Ghost_Medley]

Re: ''To be named pack'' (submissions open)

soul, it was looking pretty promising but then ya lost me at the recent posts.

[choof]

Re: ''To be named pack'' (submissions open)

Alright i'll tell you what i want

Try your luck and send me a file it must be
A) D6+ or High D5.

divisions mean very little and are wholly subjective as of now. no one has made any guidelines on what a division is and what a chart within a certain division looks like.

B) A file that's good, what's good is that i'll be judging if i like it or not.

this doesn't mean anything to anyone

C) It can be any song choice you want aslong as i don't mind it.

if you are going to reject charts based on song choice, then it is, as a matter of principle, not "any song choice."

Scintill's file was alright, but it wasn't what i was looking for as a chart, it was too simple as a chart and felt dull (no offense to scintill)

all I'm reading from this is that "easy charts are dull" which is almost always a sign that the person playing doesn't actually know much about making charts or what a good chart actually is. based on scintill's history of charts, I'm going to assume that it's a well made chart that happens to be on the easier side. you're not rejecting a chart because it's "bad," you're rejecting a chart because it's "too easy."

man the fuck up and say you're making a dump pack for high level players.

[choof]

Re: ''To be named pack'' (submissions open)

It's a pack without any theme in mind, just files that are hard and i like them +don't mind the song so much is where everything else is allowed, to this day there are charts that i don't like the song but the file is still enjoyable for me, that's my main message for this.

aka you just want people to make charts for you? lmao