192nds on SM 3.9?

[i love you]

Re: 192nds on SM 3.9?

Also, some people argue that 3.95 is highly unstable on their systems.

This is the ONLY reason why i don't use 3.95/4.0. 3.9 is the only version that works well on my laptop. If i were to use 3.95 or 4.0, it would bug out overtime when i use it. For example, when i go to the main menu in 3.95/4.0 editor and i select "Player Options" it would bring me to "Song Options" or if i were to select "Save" it would play the preview music which doesn't make any sense. Seems to me that 3.95 works better on a desktop than on a laptop i guess. I really don't know what causes the bug lol

[AlexDest]

Re: 192nds on SM 3.9?

yo AlexDest be kool already and use SSC like all the other kool kids

(hi5 other SSC bro's)

no

btw i need 192nds for this squarepusher song i'm stepping so

[i love you]

Re: 192nds on SM 3.9?

SM-SSC is really nice but i hate that one mp3 bug where as like if you put in a certain mp3 file in sm-ssc, it would cause the file to be offsync in the editor no matter what you do. For example, if you put in that certain type of mp3 in the editor that doesn't support SM-SSC properly and you press ctrl+P, it would play fine however if you were to start at a different location of the file then it would be randomly offsync by like a measure or two and there's NOTHING you can do about it (at least from what I've tried)

[ninjaKIWI]

Re: 192nds on SM 3.9?

Seems to me that 3.95 works better on a desktop than on a laptop i guess.

lmfao.

Also, what's so great about SSC in comparison to 3.9?

[i love you]

Re: 192nds on SM 3.9?

Better assist tick, better sound quality when music is slowed down, supports 192nds etc etc

Also, there's much more features to choose from lol

[LongGone]

Re: 192nds on SM 3.9?

Ddream (o:

[jimerax]

Re: 192nds on SM 3.9?

Fine, stability is the most important thing anyways.

3.9 and 4.0 are fine but 3.95 is a bit unstable for me.
Also, SSC's slow down feature doesn't work on my PC for some reason.

so I use 4.0 and DDream 2.0 for stepping, 3.9 is only for testplay.

[Jousway]

Re: 192nds on SM 3.9?

3.9 is unstable, 4.0 is unstable 3.95 is just really unstable shit, the most stable version is 3.9+

[i love you]

Re: 192nds on SM 3.9?

3.9+ is very stable indeed but i hate the fact that in the SM file, it would add in a bunch of crap in it that's not even needed. I also hate the fact that it would sometimes make a lot of nonexistent EDIT charts for no reason. For example, lets say that you finished your chart on 3.9+ and saved it. If you were to play it on for example, on 3.95 or 4.0, it would show like 2-5 EDIT charts that's either completely empty or it contains auto generate charts for no reason at all.

EDIT: Honestly, i think if 3.9 just supported 192nds, support cmod play in the editor, had better sound quality when slowed down AND had online play, i think it would be the most stable version ever. I honestly do NOT believe that 3.95 is 3.9 but with online play and supported 192nds, i think they added much more to that to make it so buggy. Ever wonder why 3.9 can ALWAYS play edit charts but on 3.95 it sometimes doesn't read it?

[qqwref]

Re: 192nds on SM 3.9?

Supporting 192nds is relatively easy (if you can recompile, at least - I think you have to change SnapDisplay, NoteTypes, and NoteDisplay), but the other things you mentioned would take some serious coding/bugfixes. I agree, though - if there was a version of 3.9 that did what you said, without major bugs, I'd never want to use anything else.

Oh yeah, and the editor should also fix the bug that messes up BPMs when you compress/extend sections with BPM changes...

[who_cares973]

Re: 192nds on SM 3.9?

Fine, stability is the most important thing anyways.

3.9 and 4.0 are fine but 3.95 is a bit unstable for me.
Also, SSC's slow down feature doesn't work on my PC for some reason.

so I use 4.0 and DDream 2.0 for stepping, 3.9 is only for testplay.

theres a ddream 2.0 what?!

e: wow for the longest time i thought i was using beta 1.6 lmao but ive been using 2.0 go figure

[MetzgerSM]

Re: 192nds on SM 3.9?

I was very used to step on 4.0 but Icy introduced me to DDream after I was against it for over a year.
It is really a good tool to step more accurate, faster and more stable because I just hit shift-S like every 20 notes to save

[rparty89]

Re: 192nds on SM 3.9?

yo AlexDest be kool already and use SSC like all the other kool kids

(hi5 other SSC bro's)

Jous i know we hate each other but i use SSC so hi5 :P

[Darkslave]

Re: 192nds on SM 3.9?

SM-SSC is really nice but i hate that one mp3 bug where as like if you put in a certain mp3 file in sm-ssc, it would cause the file to be offsync in the editor no matter what you do. For example, if you put in that certain type of mp3 in the editor that doesn't support SM-SSC properly and you press ctrl+P, it would play fine however if you were to start at a different location of the file then it would be randomly offsync by like a measure or two and there's NOTHING you can do about it (at least from what I've tried)

This might be because your song is VBR, try re-encoding it into 256kbps and see if it still does it.

[Jousway]

Re: 192nds on SM 3.9?

Jous i know we hate each other but i use SSC so hi5 :P

<3