Re: Why are people hanging on to 3.9/3.95?
SM5 is almost better than 3.9 in every way, I'll give it that. I mean, it'd be amazing if people start using that more. I REALLY like it so far.
There's only 2 problems I don't like about it though.
1) Editor is a little more inconvenient to use BUT it's actually better because we have MORE possibilities to do MORE things that 3.9 can't do. So in turn, I'm better with it. But the Step and Song timing may get annoying to switch back and forth, but luckily Alpha 2 fixed it so it remembers the last timing you edited.
2) Warps. This is just one issue I have MOSTLY because of pad files. Reason is, warps don't convert BACKWARDS into OpenITG, which uses negative BPMs instead. And since SM5 doesn't have this option (yet), I still have to use OpenITG to fix this unfortunately :< but ah well.
SM5 is almost better than 3.9 in every way, I'll give it that. I mean, it'd be amazing if people start using that more. I REALLY like it so far.
There's only 2 problems I don't like about it though.
1) Editor is a little more inconvenient to use BUT it's actually better because we have MORE possibilities to do MORE things that 3.9 can't do. So in turn, I'm better with it. But the Step and Song timing may get annoying to switch back and forth, but luckily Alpha 2 fixed it so it remembers the last timing you edited.
2) Warps. This is just one issue I have MOSTLY because of pad files. Reason is, warps don't convert BACKWARDS into OpenITG, which uses negative BPMs instead. And since SM5 doesn't have this option (yet), I still have to use OpenITG to fix this unfortunately :< but ah well.







NEVER CHANGING)
Comment