Too much emphasis on full combo

[Brainmaster07]

I boo-whored and got 7th on Caprice, case and point.

(I suspected that boo-whoring was possible when .65 came out, and was simply trying it out, 7th first try. I've never done it since because it's so freaking cheap, but will morals stop anyone else? probably not everyone.)

[Nima]

actually you got 7th caprice cause the scores sucked when you first did it :P And you still did ie. your forffr score

[Brainmaster07]

actually you got 7th caprice cause the scores sucked when you first did it :P And you still did ie. your forffr score

=/, originally I did, but now I can beat For FFr with just as good of a score with like 20 boos.

And it was a few weeks after the release... so they were kinda bad, but not like, instant high scores.

[Ice-Dragon]

Yeah I wouldn't mind a high score clear... It would also be good to flush out some of the hacked scores as well.

[ultima301]

I don't post as much anymore...but I'm still a big ffr player/fan..and YES, we should modify the scoring to less emphasize the combo...me and lightdarkness wagered in breaking the common, he got well over 200 goods (bad run I assume ld ^_^) and I around 75 goods and 10 average...but 1 miss...guess who won..he did...I do not think that is very fair ^_^
Just a suggestion on the scoring system, here is what I think would work a lot better:

Perfect : 1000
Good : 500
Average : 150
Max combo : 100 times max combo (for example 150*100=15000, where 150 is the person's max combo)
Miss : -500
Boo : -500 (keeps combo)
This puts a LOT less emphasis on combo, while still keeping it a moderate factor.