Senior member.

[midnghtraver]

These members shouldn't be senior members. less than 300 posts.

[Matrixdude]

Re: Senior member.

And "these members" are...?

[Doug31]

Re: Senior member.

Which members?

Edit: ninja'd.

[midnghtraver]

Re: Senior member.

WTF I had a pic.

Well here,

[alster1]

Re: Senior member.

they might be making a custom title?
i donno...

[Tps222]

Re: Senior member.

Interesting error. It doesn't really matter though, no one acknowledges those titles anyways.

[obie32one]

Re: Senior member.

It doesn't really matter much...
Senior member or not, I still haven't heard of them before.

[Sh4d0wRe4p3r666]

Re: Senior member.

WTF I had a pic.

Well here,

The the FFR elite supporters list. They may be part of there.

[irishknight]

Re: Senior member.

You people aren't looking closely enough. Of course they would be accepted as senior members, since they JOINED in 2003! And besides, that post was BACK in 2003, probably the standards of how many posts they posted to make you a senior were lower.

"Case" Closed.

[Squeek]

Re: Senior member.

These members shouldn't be senior members. less than 300 posts.

*fewer.

Also, Synth might've changed / added something to make it join date instead of postcount.

[obie32one]

Re: Senior member.

I think "Senior members" should be decide by join date rather than post count IMO.

[irishknight]

Re: Senior member.

It could be probably both.