Rework FFR scoring to be based on perfects and not combo

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Arch0wl
    Banned
    FFR Simfile Author
    • Dec 2002
    • 6344

    #1

    Rework FFR scoring to be based on perfects and not combo

    Alot of times, on harder songs, the better scores have really crappy pa, and people can boowhore their way to the top. If it was based on perfects, misses would take off about 2 combos worth in score, and boos would take off 3. Combo is a really irrelevant part of the game, it only matters on FFR because it's been made to matter like that.

    Synth, if you read this, we can continue this on AIM.
  • makaveli121212
    FFR Player
    • May 2003
    • 3823

    #2
    no doubt this should be should be done, i agree 100%
    Originally posted by VxDx
    Stick it in her butt and pee.

    Comment

    • User6773

      #3
      I agree. To prove a point: In DDR 1st mix, the scoring system was similar to FFR's (meaning combos were king, and if you missed a single beat your whole score was screwed.) They eventually changed this because people were sick of getting blown out of the water for making one stupid mistake.

      edit: having come up with the concept for boos, I love how the word "boowhore" has worked its way into FFR vocabulary, apparantely

      Comment

      • Reach
        FFR Simfile Author
        FFR Simfile Author
        • Jun 2003
        • 7471

        #4
        yep. this is the next major step. the combo system sucks. Miss in the wrong spot and you're screwed een though you could be doing awesome.

        Marvelous timing would be nice too, and maybe worth a bit more than a perfect.

        Comment

        • HN006_Blazeman
          FFR Player
          • Nov 2003
          • 20

          #5
          The current system is like this:

          Perfect * 500
          Good * 250
          Average * 50
          Combo * 1000
          Miss * -300

          I think a good reworking of the score system would be like this:

          Perfect * 1000 (x2)
          Good * 500 (x2)
          Average * 100 (x2)
          Combo * 500 (1/2)
          Miss * -750 (x2.5)

          So if you get EVERY arrow perfect, you get the same score in both systems, and there is more emphisis on precision than combo-scoring, in case you don't.
          Bowser: Destroyed him.
          Wily: Owned Him.
          Ganon: Got him downed!
          \\_Yoshi Bonus Stage unlocked! Didn\'t get more than 10 seconds, though...
          Sepheroth: Finally...Beat...Him...

          Comment

          • 3rr0r
            FFR Player
            • Oct 2003
            • 134

            #6
            AHHH mixed feeling this would kill my score for some songs and really improve it for others.
            Combine the 2 maybe keeping combos big but adding your previous combos so that if u get 128 combo then a miss then a 123 combo u get 251*.75 points.
            also if u made misses that much you could get a good perfect combo going then miss a whole bunch and end up with a negitive score.
            please rework this before putting anything major changing into ffr and also poll a huge number of ppl on revamped sytem that you took a month to figure out of course.
            you can ignore the truth or deny it out right but that doesn\'t change the fact that you\'re wrong!!

            I like Flamethrowers period.

            Comment

            • Nima
              FFR Player
              • Jun 2003
              • 3526

              #7
              how about stepmania scoring = good idea
              DELETE THIS ACCOUNT

              Comment

              • User6773

                #8
                I like that FFR has its own scoring style. I think it should retain its own scoring style. However, they need to fix things. Why is it that 250 perfects, then a miss, then 250 perfects again, is far fewer points than 500 averages? It just doesn't make sense.

                Comment

                • Reach
                  FFR Simfile Author
                  FFR Simfile Author
                  • Jun 2003
                  • 7471

                  #9
                  i say scrap the current system..as in 'the combo system' where your score is dependant on combo.

                  I say add MARVELOUS timing...and

                  make the scores like this

                  Marvelous * 6000
                  Perfect * 5000
                  Good * 2500
                  Average * 500
                  Miss * -5000(possibly more...i dunno?)
                  Boo * -2500

                  no bonus

                  Seems like a good scoring system to me. Sure, Maybe change it around a little bit....but something like that makes more sense to me. Misses will do quite a bit of damage to score...boo whoring will hurt your score badly and it will be very dependant on how many perfs/mars you get.

                  Comment

                  • Moogy
                    嗚呼
                    FFR Simfile Author
                    • Aug 2003
                    • 10303

                    #10
                    I like Reach's idea.
                    Plz visit my blog

                    ^^^ vintage signature from like 2006 preserved

                    Comment

                    • Brainmaster07
                      FFR Player
                      • Jun 2003
                      • 2891

                      #11
                      Yes, but I think there should be some sort of bonus for combos. It shouldn't be dependant on it, as a multiplier, but maybe just a little add on. Going along with reach's idea maybe - combo*100. Not much, but I don't think combos should become worthless.

                      Comment

                      • plasmix
                        FFR Player
                        • Jun 2003
                        • 3639

                        #12
                        They basically are in SM.

                        Comment

                        • Cenright
                          You thought I was a GUY?!
                          • Sep 2003
                          • 3139

                          #13
                          Problem 1 is that boos are not very costly. If they actually costed people a lot, they would still be able to beat a level, but they wouldn't get to the top.

                          Problem 2 is the combo thing. Even if Marvelous's were not instituted, I think HN006 Blazeman had a good idea. You don't make massive changes in scoring, you just change how the variables are multiplied.

                          Another thing... Marvelous should not be better than a perfect. That is where SM is stupid. Perfect is just that. PERFECT. If you were going to add another, you would need to make it:

                          Perfect
                          (Great)
                          Good
                          Average
                          (Poor)
                          Miss
                          Boo

                          You could add either of the ones in parentheses. Just keep Perfect on top.

                          If you didn't, Perfecting a song would not be the best thing. Come on. Are we saying there is something better than perfection?
                          Marvelousion? (that just sounds stupid)
                          http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/...Cube_in_55.mpg

                          Comment

                          • Brainmaster07
                            FFR Player
                            • Jun 2003
                            • 2891

                            #14
                            I always wondered how marvelous could be better then perfect .

                            Comment

                            • Cenright
                              You thought I was a GUY?!
                              • Sep 2003
                              • 3139

                              #15
                              SM obviously is in need of a vocabulary improvement.
                              http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/...Cube_in_55.mpg

                              Comment

                              Working...