Like/Dislike Option for Simfiles

[supermousie]

Re: Like/Dislike Option for Simfiles

Yeah, just reading the thread title, I automatically thought:

inb4 Dossar's files get downvoted 1,811,989 times.

Tho i have nothing against the guy. Seems chill (sun)

[SKG_Scintill]

Re: Like/Dislike Option for Simfiles

If the entire community downvotes dossar's files, perhaps that's because the community doesn't like dossar's files

[mrpreggers]

Re: Like/Dislike Option for Simfiles

Only real downside I see is that a few steppers might get discouraged.. But that's gonna happen when people complain in the "Songs of the Week" thread anyway. No one who actually plays this game is going to give two ****s about the rating. At most, it'll prepare you for the AIDS that you're about to experience but no one is going to judge the chart solely on its player rating.

[TC_Halogen]

Re: Like/Dislike Option for Simfiles

If the entire community downvotes dossar's files, perhaps that's because the community doesn't like dossar's files

it's pretty well known that people jump on the "hate Dossar" bandwagon even if it involves his simfiles (even when that has absolutely nothing to do with his attitude in the past/present), and some of the people that hate Dossar's file don't even have a place to talk because they aren't proficient at all

just felt like getting that out there

[SKG_Scintill]

Re: Like/Dislike Option for Simfiles

even the biased part of the community is part of the community

[MarioNintendo]

Re: Like/Dislike Option for Simfiles

+1 tho

[brothaice]

Re: Like/Dislike Option for Simfiles

Nifty although it seems ultimately pointless.

What is going to be done if a file is liked/disliked a bunch? My guess is nothing. Definately no one is going to change the file. Sounds like a way for people to give files they like props (which there are already multiple ways of doing this (the forums/the stepartists profile)) or show they dislike them which is possible now.

Sorry I just dont see what would be accomplished from the effort needed to implement this.