people go play ==planet bufang== in sm. Its practically the same file, just without the freezes
<%SSH|Korysar> does anyone else watch pornos for the soundtrack
<Mehified> No offense to you tho xd
<@Alive> i misunderstood the meaning of shiney instruments and he tole me to calm down
<+lurker> if i want porno music
<+lurker> i'll listen to the sonic 3 ost
<%SSH|Korysar> LMFAO
<sjoecool1991> ahaha
permission from stephen kay? yea. it's a whole ordeal though.... stargroup and i have talked about it, and there will be a front page news story about stephen and the song when it goes public in 3 weeks.
The current GoSW has a great stepfile. BUT the mp3 is terrible.
There is a better version of GoSW where the part with all the trills (repeats G) is replaced with a more complicated melody line. The stepfile would look quite different if this alternative version of GoSW was stepped, instead of the current version. Many bms files have more than one version of the same song built in as separate levels. I believe the version of GoSW I'm talking about would make a better stepfile.
GoSW v2 would call for many more jumps and/or hands, less trill, more jacks, and more breaks in the 24th stream. It may be better to step the bass in this stepfile. Moreover, this would probably become an FMO.
The song would be going on -spring wind- (another) to be most precise. It's not really a v2, because the song isn't identical. And the bms level itself is differentiated by 7key and 7key another.
About the bms file thing: Stormy, Amefuri Koneko, and Twinklesky may have different versions too. Seagull, probably not.
Last edited by Xx{Midday}xX; 08-28-2008, 02:54 PM.
Any FFR song title discrepancies? List them here. Willing to accurately translate Japanese for free Accumulating all playstyles here!
つまんないシグでスマソ(´・ω・`)
Oh ya. Speaking of 300. yo tass, 300 is hardhouse/hardstyle. not speedcore.
Planet karama is a great file but thats to be expected though. Although the file felt awkward to play though because so many things were missing in the file.
Saying stuff like there was a lot missing in the file without saying what, or how you'd like to see it improved, isn't really helpful.
If you specify "oh yeah for example that slow sax part in the middle seemed really oddly layered and the patterns on the ending 24th run aren't very fun" then it's a lot more constructive comment, you know?
Comment