SOTW#2: Klung Kung 2004

[Magic_V2]

I like it. Discuss.

[xjohnieboyx]

Re: SOTW#2: Klunk Kung 2004

Good steps I guess. Will be AAA'd by many

[Shashakiro]

Re: SOTW#2: Klunk Kung 2004

gaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah WHY IS IT OFFSYNC =(

[Ryusei_]

Re: SOTW#2: Klunk Kung 2004

Good steps I guess. Will be AAA'd by many

I agree. I personally love the steps...This may even drive me to AAA it one day.

[xjohnieboyx]

Re: SOTW#2: Klunk Kung 2004

Best PA is 33 goods but not FC.

[Silver_Brian]

Re: SOTW#2: Klunk Kung 2004

Spell it right please.

[Shashakiro]

Re: SOTW#2: Klunk Kung 2004

they're like twice as fun when synced right

I'll talk to Synth and see if he can resync it.

[Afrobean]

Re: SOTW#2: Klunk Kung 2004

Ok.

First of all, it's Klung Klung 2004, not Klung Klung.

Second of all, it's a remix of a song originally appearing in Keyboardmania I believe. Why is it not in Arcade?

Third of all: don't see how so many of you can handle this **** at C300. Additionally, I'm not satisfied with the use of jumps, but I know now that it's considered acceptable to use jumps to create a 8th jump stream just so it's "funner", even if the 8th notes the jumps are on are not especially worth of a jump.

[Silver_Brian]

Re: SOTW#2: Klunk Kung 2004

It's Klung Kung 2004.

Probably Shash's best work rofl. Working on FC, my fingers are too cold right now =/

[jimerax]

Re: SOTW#2: Klunk Kung 2004

It was pretty fun, kind of a new Gradeus type song.

[Afrobean]

Re: SOTW#2: Klunk Kung 2004

It's Klung Kung 2004.

rofl

Good catch.

Additionally, I guess it's ACTUALLY "KlungKung 2004" with no space. The point still stands that the name has "2004" in it, though.

Haha.

[itmorr]

Re: SOTW#2: Klunk Kung 2004

It's so fun!

[Silver_Brian]

Re: SOTW#2: Klunk Kung 2004

Additionally, I guess it's ACTUALLY "KlungKung 2004" with no space.

Yeah, I guess that's right.

P.S. Arrgh dammit last stream

[krazykhalid]

Re: SOTW#2: Klunk Kung 2004

this songs fun gj shash on the stepfile

[Shashakiro]

Re: SOTW#2: Klunk Kung 2004

Ok.

First of all, it's Klung Klung 2004, not Klung Klung.

I didn't notice that the DWI didn't have the 2004 in the title, whoops ><

Additionally, I'm not satisfied with the use of jumps, but I know now that it's considered acceptable to use jumps to create a 8th jump stream just so it's "funner", even if the 8th notes the jumps are on are not especially worth of a jump.

At least you acknowledge that no one really shares your view on this.

Does your ideal file have no jumps whatsoever or what?