Why aren't rates above 1.0 counting for scores?

[mi40]

Re: Why aren't rates above 1.0 counting for scores?

gotta work hard for them internet numbers

[alloyus]

Re: Why aren't rates above 1.0 counting for scores?

you're drunk

[Choofers]

Re: Why aren't rates above 1.0 counting for scores?

And your logic is flawed

[EzExZeRo7497]

Re: Why aren't rates above 1.0 counting for scores?

I'm pretty sure the main intention of playing files on rates is to have more of a challenge more than being lazy about it lol. The song length being reduced is more of a plus more than anything

[mi40]

Re: Why aren't rates above 1.0 counting for scores?

And your logic is flawed

alloyus kinda agrees with what we're saying give him a break

let's go poop on plan_b tho

[alloyus]

Re: Why aren't rates above 1.0 counting for scores?

Ok. Let me break it down for you if you're gonna be like that. You're so-called "experienced" players. Fuck, let's use you. Join date: Dec 2008. I'll even use Dec 31. Today is August 7, 2013. That's roughly 1705 days. If you even played for half an hour every day, that's fucking 852 hours. And most people certainly play for longer than that when they do play, even if most people don't play every single day.

Edit: Thank you Anaru ;_; <3

[i love you]

Re: Why aren't rates above 1.0 counting for scores?

I just read through this thread and I have to agree with this statement.

You can resolve both the playability issues and the issues with respecting the artists by allowing people to play songs on rates, but only allowing the song to -record- a score after a full, non-rated run has been done. That way, players aren't forced to play a song fully to play it on rates, but they are required to give a song a full play before being able to record a given result on it.

To be honest, I do not know why you guys are still arguing about this. The solution is right here xD

[Choofers]

Re: Why aren't rates above 1.0 counting for scores?

Ok. Let me break it down for you if you're gonna be like that. You're so-called "experienced" players. Fuck, let's use you. Join date: Dec 2008. I'll even use Dec 31. Today is August 7, 2013. That's roughly 1705 days. If you even played for half an hour every day, that's fucking 852 hours. And most people certainly play for longer than that when they do play, even if most people don't play every single day.

Edit: Thank you Anaru ;_; <3

Up until recently, I had very little reason to open up FFR. Every time I played, I was confronted by a huge song list, filled with boring/bad songs/charts, and a mediocre engine that lagged like crazy, even on my gaming computer. I didn't play FFR because I was lazy, I didn't play because I fucking hated playing.

[Fission]

Re: Why aren't rates above 1.0 counting for scores?

To be honest, I do not know why you guys are still arguing about this. The solution is right here xD

because you are ignoring every argument against it, and it isn't a solution just because you say it is

[Xx{Fallen}xX]

Re: Why aren't rates above 1.0 counting for scores?

I just read through this thread and I have to agree with this statement.

To be honest, I do not know why you guys are still arguing about this. The solution is right here xD

There isnt much point to this since we can already play all the songs we want on rates, its an unnecessary restriction that further deters us from playing the easy songs.

[alloyus]

Re: Why aren't rates above 1.0 counting for scores?

Thank you for actually talking to me about it. Not even necessarily trying to accuse you (setting aside the fact that you're attacking me). I just know it's definitely gonna happen with people, and it's a shame that it will happen. Anaru's already shown me that there probably would be more good from rates recording than bad, like just playing casually and getting some scores recorded here and there.

[Choofers]

Re: Why aren't rates above 1.0 counting for scores?

I just don't get why you're bringing up laziness when it shouldn't really be a factor. This is a game, enjoyment is the main factor.

[bmah]

Re: Why aren't rates above 1.0 counting for scores?

because you are ignoring every argument against it, and it isn't a solution just because you say it is

Rebound just said he read through the thread. It's very possible he simply disagrees with those arguments. People can disagree, ya know?

[Choofers]

Re: Why aren't rates above 1.0 counting for scores?

ya know?

[mi40]

Re: Why aren't rates above 1.0 counting for scores?

what i don't get is, nobody has anything to lose by lifting restrictions on letting rates record

but by putting restrictions we put a lot at stake, like the enjoyment of the game for potentially many new players and old players alike..

what do we get out of restricting 1.0+ rate recordings? pretty much nothing if you ask me