Oh and rednanaki, ever get your token? It would suck if they put it ingame and didn't let you have it. <_<
No, I'll never get Zephon either. Since I'm not even close to being able to AAA anything challenging, let alone very challenging (since getting perfectly 9 goods is weird and almost like being able to AAA a song)
BLAH!
--
Best AAA: The Dream of Scarlet
Best FC: The Adventures of Lolol
If we don't get two more people to join before tomorrow, can we just give two people a bye as opposed to going through an entire prelim round? That seems to be far more time efficient to me.
AAA's: 81ish Most Recent: Prototypical Method of Play: Spread
With 64 people the brackets look like this
----W32-16-08-04-02-01 \
64-------------------------4-2-1
----L32-32-24-16-10-06-03/
With 62
----W31
62-----
----L31
Having an odd amount on both sides is a problem.
However, I came up with this scenario. In the first round give the top winner and loser a bye for the second round. In the second round give a bye to the top loser for the third round.
----W31-16-08-04-02-01 \
62-------------------------4-2-1
----L31-31-24-16-10-06-03/
*EDIT* 63 player scenario. Give a first round bye to one person. Then give the top scoring loser from the first round a bye in the second. That will straighten things out faster than the 62 scenario acually.
----W32-16-08-04-02-01 \
63-------------------------4-2-1
----L31-32-24-16-10-06-03/
While it is a bit more confusing than in the example shown (if I posted a 64 bracket, that'd be too fricken big, plus I couldn't come up with all the names <_<), that's basically how the 64 brackets will works. Although that is quite a good idea with the byes. I was thinking of something a bit different.
Something to remember: - TWO LOSES AND YOU'RE ELIMINATED
1ST PLACE 2ND PLACE 3RD PLACE Purple means that this set had no losers come in from the Winner's bracket
Comment